Mitt Romney; Defined (Al Gore, employment, Republicans, liberals)

[70Ford]

What’s intriguing, looking back at this period, is that Romney was living multiple realities in three overlapping dimensions. Geographically, he was positioning himself to run for office either in Utah or in Massachusetts. Politically, he was preparing to present himself as either a pro-lifer (in Utah) or a pro-choicer (in Massachusetts). And financially, he was preserving his option to resume full-time management of Bain, even as he took on the Olympics and considered a political career. Chief executive of Bain was just one of many things Romney was and, at the same time, wasn’t. It didn’t define the man. Nothing does.

Romney and Bain, 1999-2002: His “retirement” is just another flip-flop. - Slate Magazine

[stillkit]

Originally Posted by 70Ford

What’s intriguing, looking back at this period, is that Romney was living multiple realities in three overlapping dimensions. Geographically, he was positioning himself to run for office either in Utah or in Massachusetts. Politically, he was preparing to present himself as either a pro-lifer (in Utah) or a pro-choicer (in Massachusetts). And financially, he was preserving his option to resume full-time management of Bain, even as he took on the Olympics and considered a political career. Chief executive of Bain was just one of many things Romney was and, at the same time, wasn’t. It didn’t define the man. Nothing does.

Romney and Bain, 1999-2002: His “retirement” is just another flip-flop. - Slate Magazine

He's sounding more and more like Bill Clinton in Al Gore's body with George Bush's propensity to lie.

[wade52]

.


In a word...

Make that word, chickenhawk.

[Trader8]

Originally Posted by wade52

.


In a word...

Make that word, chickenhawk.

Ah, a fine collection of chickenhawks

Well done, sir

[jt800]

I LOVE when Liberals think they can "define" a Conservative....as if anyone gives that even a shred of credibility.

Conservatives don't need to "define" Obama.....we can see clearly that he was a mistake of a President and that America shouldn't repeat their mistakes.

[jt800]

Originally Posted by Trader8

Ah, a fine collection of chickenhawks

Well done, sir

Why would Moonbats care about "chickenhawks"?

Your last two Presidents were BOTH chickenhawks who waged wars without ever serving in the military.

[florida.bob]

While visiting WWII sites, I heard Romney wanted to see the old Polish Navy. He asked Walesa where to catch a glass bottom tour boat.

[Ed from California]

Better start getting used to calling him President Romney.

[MTAtech]

Originally Posted by jt800

I LOVE when Liberals think they can "define" a Conservative....as if anyone gives that even a shred of credibility.

Conservatives don't need to "define" Obama.....we can see clearly that he was a mistake of a President and that America shouldn't repeat their mistakes.

While you say Conservatives don't need to define Obama, you go on to define President Obama (falsely) as a failed President. Under President Obama's leadership the nation avoided a depression; under President Obama employment reversed from massive loses to gains; under President Obama al Qaeda has been combated and Odama bin Laden killed; under President Obama General Motors, who Mr. Romney wanted to go bankrupt, was saved, is profitable and employs thousands of employees -- not including the supply chain.

The only thing I criticize President Obama for is not being tougher with Republicans and giving them too many legislative concessions, something Romney will clear increase.

As usual, there will be no discussion of the article.