Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No wonder the Obama administration appears to be trying to suppress the military vote (I'm not saying they necessarily are, I'm saying it looks like they are).
Hey, an invasion of Iran is gonna take a lot of feet on the ground. I guess people are just voting for job security.
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
No wonder the Obama administration appears to be trying to suppress the military vote (I'm not saying they necessarily are, I'm saying it looks like they are).
Then what exactly are you saying, if you're not saying it, but in fact you did?
Hey, an invasion of Iran is gonna take a lot of feet on the ground. I guess people are just voting for job security.
Then what exactly are you saying, if you're not saying it, but in fact you did?
No one is going to invade Iran, goof. It looks like our troops want a commander in chief who respects them and that they respect.
I was reading something from a wide of an injured victim of the Fort Hood shooting. She was unpleased how Obama responded to that incident. Just one of many
Hey, an invasion of Iran is gonna take a lot of feet on the ground. I guess people are just voting for job security.
Obama has said that he would go to war with Iran if necessary as well. Romney, like Obama, has said that it should be done only if other means of trying to stop them from obtaining nuclear weapons do not work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon
Then what exactly are you saying, if you're not saying it, but in fact you did?
I'm saying I don't know if they are, but it appears that they are. I simply don't have proof that it's an intentional attempt at voter suppression.
I hope someone is looking into why there are problems getting troops info needed to vote. Apparently, voter id laws are racist, but voter suppression in reality is okay with liberals....since its clear that they prefer a new Commander in Chief.
It seriously is laughable that troops would be supporting Republicans when they do so little to help vets that return from war to treat and heal them and to integrate them back into society. GOP have no problems sending them of to wars though.
I hope someone is looking into why there are problems getting troops info needed to vote. Apparently, voter id laws are racist, but voter suppression in reality is okay with liberals....since its clear that they prefer a new Commander in Chief.
What voter suppression is clear? The link says that military members and spouses aren't requesting absentee ballots this cycle. Not that they aren't being delivered, or not being counted. That's not suppression, it's the military not liking either choice and exercising their right to not vote. They never cared for Obama, or Democrats in general for that matter, but they also apparently can't stomach voting for Romney.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
