Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jeb will struggle to win the Repub nomination but if he gets it, he will be a tough man to beat for the Dems because he will be able to win back many Hispanics and wil have big money supporting him.
While I get the "I'm not my father, not my brother" message there is just something about voting for another Bush that will rub many Americans the wrong way even if they like his ideas and leadership direction. I am among them. I prefer Christie and would pick him over Clinton knowing what I know now. Unfortunately, Bush is amassing gobs of money from the Wall Street Republicans and is virtually assured of the nomination (don't fool yourself - it is all about money). It looks like Clinton-Bush again and it is a sad day for the American political process.
While I get the "I'm not my father, not my brother" message there is just something about voting for another Bush that will rub many Americans the wrong way even if they like his ideas and leadership direction. I am among them. I prefer Christie and would pick him over Clinton knowing what I know now. Unfortunately, Bush is amassing gobs of money from the Wall Street Republicans and is virtually assured of the nomination (don't fool yourself - it is all about money). It looks like Clinton-Bush again and it is a sad day for the American political process.
It's all about the money... yep. Bush is the nominee. Already in the bag.
While I get the "I'm not my father, not my brother" message there is just something about voting for another Bush that will rub many Americans the wrong way even if they like his ideas and leadership direction. I am among them. I prefer Christie and would pick him over Clinton knowing what I know now. Unfortunately, Bush is amassing gobs of money from the Wall Street Republicans and is virtually assured of the nomination (don't fool yourself - it is all about money). It looks like Clinton-Bush again and it is a sad day for the American political process.
You really think Jeb can win the primaries in Iowa, South Carolina, and the other Tea Party circus states? Im convinced Jeb will be forced to drop out even if he is the best chance to beat Hillary, the Tea Party types are too focused and demanding of 100% purity 100% of the time.
While I get the "I'm not my father, not my brother" message there is just something about voting for another Bush that will rub many Americans the wrong way even if they like his ideas and leadership direction. I am among them. I prefer Christie and would pick him over Clinton knowing what I know now. Unfortunately, Bush is amassing gobs of money from the Wall Street Republicans and is virtually assured of the nomination (don't fool yourself - it is all about money). It looks like Clinton-Bush again and it is a sad day for the American political process.
Jeb will struggle to win the Repub nomination but if he gets it, he will be a tough man to beat for the Dems because he will be able to win back many Hispanics and wil have big money supporting him.
What would he do to win the Hispanic vote? Do they have special needs that aren't being met? What makes them any different than any other group in this country?
You really think Jeb can win the primaries in Iowa, South Carolina, and the other Tea Party circus states? Im convinced Jeb will be forced to drop out even if he is the best chance to beat Hillary, the Tea Party types are too focused and demanding of 100% purity 100% of the time.
Tea party circus? Still can't debate without insults, can you? Just what is this purity you speak of?
Tea party circus? Still can't debate without insults, can you? Just what is this purity you speak of?
The demand that a candidate be 100% conservative on every single issue without any leeway or moderation. In the real world, governing REQUIRES COMPROMISE AND MODERATION.
The demand that a candidate be 100% conservative on every single issue without any leeway or moderation. In the real world, governing REQUIRES COMPROMISE AND MODERATION.
Who demands it? Liberals? The GOP can run under any platform they choose and many Americans want a conservative president. Purity? WTH does that mean? Some issues can be compromised on some cannot. Still no reason for you constantly attack the Teaparty with childish insults.
Who demands it? Liberals? The GOP can run under any platform they choose and many Americans want a conservative president. Purity? WTH does that mean? Some issues can be compromised on some cannot. Still no reason for you constantly attack the Teaparty with childish insults.
Ill attack them until they stop costing the GOP elections. Mitt Romney would have won had the Tea Party not forced him to pander to the extreme right wing elements to win the primary. If Mitt had been allowed to be Mitt he would be president right now.
We could have taken the Senate in 2010 if it wasent for lunatics like Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell. Remember Todd Akin from 2012? Well he was ahead by a very comfortable margin until his "legitimate rape" goof.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
