Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,961 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26699

Advertisements

The GOP will dump both Trump and Carson and most likely run Bush. But, I think Trump may team up with Carson and run as an Independent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:02 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,117,231 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50 View Post
You realize that a 10% tax would be a tax increase for over 50% of the taxpayers, right? There would be no deductions or anything like that. Just a straight tax on whatever income you have.
It never amazes me how the super elites of a certain political party are able to convince their great unwashed masses to vote against their self-interest time and time again.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:03 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,117,231 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
The GOP will dump both Trump and Carson and most likely run Bush. But, I think Trump may team up with Carson and run as an Independent.
That would be a Democratic fantasy . . . . . unless they end up with less than 270 electoral votes, resulting in the GOP-controlled House selecting the POTUS.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Agreed. The A bomb probably saved a LOT of lives on BOTH sides between the US not having to fight street for street in Japan AND the defenders realizing being killed would NOT help out the Japanese survivors.

Carson: this has been a batcrap crazy election and, it might get rowdier before the Dems and Repubs have their final candidates for 2016.
yes.. war is ugly business. I definitely agree with you.

Nobody wanted to talk about it, but Japan lost 129,000–246,000 because of the atomic bombs.

Various scientific surveys of Iraqi deaths resulting from the first four years of the Iraq War estimated that between 151,000 to over one million Iraqis died as a result of conflict during this time. A later study, published in 2011, estimated that approximately 500,000 Iraqis had died.

which war is more politically correct now?

So Ben Carson is right,

He said that if there are going to be any established rules for war, the main one ought to be “no war,” he said.

Other than that, we have to win,” Mr. Carson said. “Our life depends on it.”

Only a fool would disagree with this common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:15 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,486,570 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
That would be a Democratic fantasy . . . . .
More of a Democratic fantasy that is occurring right now with Trump?

Not sure if that is possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:17 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
See, you did not read my earlier post or did not follow it. As I stated, registered Democrats and Independents are not part of the respondent pool of 376, so their views are NOT reflected in the poll. Otherwise, the poll would be absolutely meaningless.

Mick
Sorry, where does it note that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,961 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26699
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
That would be a Democratic fantasy . . . . . unless they end up with less than 270 electoral votes, resulting in the GOP-controlled House selecting the POTUS.

Mick
Is there no chance that Trump and Carson could take the election? The more I watch, hear, see and read, the more I think it could be possible. People are REALLY fed up like I have never seen in my lifetime.

It is past time to dump the 2 party system so why not do it in 2016?

The Democrats have yet to come up with a viable candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 05:10 PM
 
1,978 posts, read 1,553,040 times
Reputation: 2742
Ben Carson is a seventh day Adventist, follower of the nut job ellen white. He is not an evangelical. I think he will drop like a rock when the truth comes out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 05:46 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,117,231 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Sorry, where does it note that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000
It's like this. This is a random phone poll.

So they called 1,261 random landline and cell phone numbers they had.

They found that 1,021 of 1,261 of the adults answering the phone were registered voters (of any party).

They then found that 376 of 1,021 were registered Republican.

Mick
Per above, 240 of 1,261 people called were not registered to vote. The remaining 1,021 were registered to vote. 376 of the 1,021 were registered Republicans. The remaining 645 registered voters were either an independent or affiliated with the Democratic Party or some other minor party. Accordingly, if you sample only those 376 respondents, by definition you are excluding all non-Republicans.

There is a table at the end of the article OP linked.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 05:49 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Per above, 240 of 1,261 people called were not registered to vote. The remaining 1,021 were registered to vote. 376 of the 1,021 were registered Republicans. The remaining 645 registered voters were either an independent or affiliated with the Democratic Party or some other minor party. Accordingly, if you sample only those 376 respondents, by definition you are excluding all non-Republicans.

There is a table at the end of the article OP linked.

Mick
None of which I questioned. I asked why does it matter what someone that is going to vote (D) thinks here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top