Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-28-2016, 11:52 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,628,813 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
From their own site
I think it's well known that Hillary's campaign pays people to vote in those kind of polls.

 
Old 09-28-2016, 11:56 AM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,294,358 times
Reputation: 7284
Reuters/Ipsos Tracking Poll

Clinton: 42%
trump:38%
Johnson: 7%
Stein: 2%

Data gathered prior to first debate.

Clinton Widens Lead Since Last Week's Tie In Latest Ipsos/Reuters Tracking Poll
 
Old 09-28-2016, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,703,250 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
But again this has been covered several times by Hillary supporters and Trump supporters. Online poll does not = garbage. Hell, Nate Silver gives CVoter a C+ rating. Are you going to argue that a supposed polling expert is wrong, too?
What has been argued is that not ALL online polls are garbage.
Some are conducted using the same methodology as phone polls - properly balanced sample, etc.

However, the polls that "pop-up" have no such controls nor are the data weighted before the results are published so that they accurately represent the voting public.
They are simply collections of the responses of the people that took the time to answer, exactly the same as any poll here on C-D.
In other words, completely unscientific.

I would argue that a C+ rating is nothing to brag about.
No idea why anyone would try to defend it.
 
Old 09-28-2016, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,703,250 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I think it's well known that Hillary's campaign pays people to vote in those kind of polls.
It's also well known that Trump's supporters flood online polls to make him look better.
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,476,450 times
Reputation: 12187
The most interesting state is Colorado. Trump has been barely ahead in the past few polls but Gary Johnson is around 13%, which makes me think in CO GJ is taking votes from Clinton rather than Trump. Sounds like Bernie voters who haven't made the jump to Clinton yet. CO is big, if Trump wins there Hillary can not loose Florida.
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:01 PM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,936,246 times
Reputation: 6927
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
What has been argued is that not ALL online polls are garbage.
Some are conducted using the same methodology as phone polls - properly balanced sample, etc.

However, the polls that "pop-up" have no such controls nor are the data weighted before the results are published so that they accurately represent the voting public.
They are simply collections of the responses of the people that took the time to answer, exactly the same as any poll here on C-D.
In other words, completely unscientific.

I would argue that a C+ rating is nothing to brag about.
No idea why anyone would try to defend it.
But you are wrong. Silver has discussed this - the difference between a "C" pollster and a "A" pollster is VERY small.

Quote:
Let me take that analogy a bit further. In baseball, there isn’t much difference in an absolute sense between a .300 hitter and a .260 hitter — it amounts to getting about one extra hit during each week of the baseball season. Likewise, the differences in poll accuracy aren’t that large. We estimate that the very best pollsters might be about 1 percentage point more accurate than the average pollster over the long run. However, the average poll in our database missed the final election outcome by 5.3 percentage points. That means even the best poll would still be off by 4.3 points. It’s almost always better to take an average of polls rather than hoping for any one of them to “hit a bullet with a bullet.”
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...lster-ratings/
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:12 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,628,813 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
It's also well known that Trump's supporters flood online polls to make him look better.

Indeed. Trump has real supporters who will vote for him. Thanks for confirming it.
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,703,250 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Indeed. Trump has real supporters who will vote for him. Thanks for confirming it.
Ah, but, even those supporters that vote in the same polls 5, 10, 20+ times only get one vote at the actual voting booth.

Unless, of course, you are advocating for them to hack the voting machines like they've hacked the polls.
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Ah, but, even those supporters that vote in the same polls 5, 10, 20+ times only get one vote at the actual voting booth.

Unless, of course, you are advocating for them to hack the voting machines like they've hacked the polls.
When Trump said the election was rigged, who knew he was talking about it being in favor of him?
 
Old 09-28-2016, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,970,740 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
The most interesting state is Colorado. Trump has been barely ahead in the past few polls but Gary Johnson is around 13%, which makes me think in CO GJ is taking votes from Clinton rather than Trump. Sounds like Bernie voters who haven't made the jump to Clinton yet. CO is big, if Trump wins there Hillary can not loose Florida.
False.

CO is not that big. It's 9 electoral votes.

Hillary could still lose FL and CO and win the election if she wins either OH or NC. However it is very unlikely Trump will win Colorado because of the Latino Population and college educated white population. If I were his campaign I would try WI or MI instead
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top