Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2016, 06:14 AM
 
Location: North Central Florida
6,218 posts, read 7,737,566 times
Reputation: 3939

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsb62574 View Post
She did her job as an attorney. It's her job. It's not like she got on national tv and called for an assassination or revolt against the government.
Yep, and today she is doing her job as a subversive idiot.

She would have us believe she is too stupid to understand technology, and openly emails classified documents on unsecured servers.......helping our enemies

Lying consistently about all manner of illegal activity she has been involved in, for decades.......helping the criminal element.

Upholding and supporting those in our society that advocate violence and death to police.......helping the panthers, BLM, and other subversives in our midst.

Massive health concerns, that have her "short circuiting" all over the place, so much her handlers have to keep her hidden from public view. Just like the old soviet leaders were kept aloof from their public.......placing all of us at risk.

In fact, if one can stretch the truth about what Trump says, into some form of threat against cankles, one could also make the stretch that the greased pig Clintoon is openly working for the overthrow, and assassination of the American way of life. Pretty much the same way 0bama has accomplished much of already.

So much so, that the communist party of the USA has endorsed dear leader cankles. Because she's doing her job, that they want done.

If you want to stretch things to the ridiculous, everyone else might also.

CN

 
Old 08-10-2016, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,978 posts, read 22,169,754 times
Reputation: 26745
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
I could have sworn the constitution specifically said everyone deserves legal representation to defend him/herself? Even the most vile human beings on earth deserve a chance to defend themselves. This is the core of our democracy.

Clinton was doing her job at the time. Why blame her for misplaced evidence?

Are you guys actually suggesting anyone who's a suspect of a horrific crime does not deserve legal representation?
Clinton VOLUNTEERED to take the case. LAUGHED about his getting off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Why is she blaming Hillary. She should blame her own lawyer for doing a lousy job defending her. This has nothing to do with being an advocate for women. Hillary was doing her job as a defense lawyer.
We all know that Hillary believes it is the fault of a woman if she is raped and in this case a child. Hillary volunteered to take the case to get a man off for raping a child. Says everything many need to know about her. Sociopath - "without a conscience".

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
Defense lawyers are suppose to be doing everything they can to get the best deal possible for their clients. As much as we hate some of the outcomes out there, do we really want defense lawyers to start not doing this?
Hillary chose to take the case and laughed about getting the man off. See most of us don't think it is funny for someone to break the law and get away with it especially when it involves a child.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
Im sure that you meant the prosecuting attorney. That said Hillary did her best to tar and feather the victim...
So much for all victims deserve to be believed. That is unless Hillary is the perps lawyer or it's her husband who is being accused.
Yes, she did. A child. Laughing while being interviewed about it. We know that she blames females when they are raped which makes her a perfect match for being the one to help sharia law move forward. She'll be able to see Bill's rape victims stoned to death and stand, well she can't stand, but be held up laughing while it is happening. This case shows just how sick Hillary was even when she was younger.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsb62574 View Post
She did her job as an attorney. It's her job. It's not like she got on national tv and called for an assassination or revolt against the government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
You really don't understand the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Sometimes, lawyers are called upon to defend people who are guilty of a crime. The state always has the burden of proof in every case. They must prove that the offender is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. By doing that, we preserve important freedoms in this country. We also protect other innocent people from the oppressive power of the state.

There is probably much to fault Hillary Clinton about. However, this is something anti-Clinton people dreamed up on a bad day.

There is nothing to it.
She still volunteered to represent a child rapist. Who volunteers to do that, gets them off and laughs about it? What sort of evil exists in a person like that?

I wonder how many Hillarybots actually listened to her laughing on the audio tape? I would say that what her supporters lack is empathy for the Clinton's victims of which there are many from the Clinton death list to the others that lost their lives at the incompetence of Hillary.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 06:15 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,129,026 times
Reputation: 8527
This was debunked the first time it bobbed to the surface. why don't you people actually do the research necessary for an HONEST post? Or is that just too much work and empirical thought for you?
 
Old 08-10-2016, 06:25 AM
 
Location: BROOKLYN NYC
1,356 posts, read 1,224,358 times
Reputation: 1564
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
This was debunked the first time it bobbed to the surface. why don't you people actually do the research necessary for an HONEST post? Or is that just too much work and empirical thought for you?
Debunked?????? That is a straight up lie and you know it.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 06:29 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,129,026 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSNY...DirtyStayOut View Post
Debunked?????? That is a straight up lie and you know it.
No, it isn't. Try a dose of the truth.

Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It : snopes.com

You don't like Hillary, I get it, but try being honest about it, instead of this kind of falsehood.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Hutto, Tx
9,249 posts, read 26,711,113 times
Reputation: 2851
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsb62574 View Post
Wow, your just a fountain of misinformation. Provide a quote of Khan blaming Trump for his son's death. You can't. That isn't what he said. It's actually not even close. I'm not sure if your intentionally lying or just really misinformed on all these issues, but it might behoove you to actually do some research before you vomit up word salad to defend Trump.
Criticized by word salad pros...well, OK, not BLAMED, but angry. So, he can express his anger, so can she. Do you feel better now?
 
Old 08-10-2016, 07:53 AM
 
45,631 posts, read 27,250,610 times
Reputation: 23920
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
No, it isn't. Try a dose of the truth.

Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It : snopes.com

You don't like Hillary, I get it, but try being honest about it, instead of this kind of falsehood.
Snopes is no good anymore. They are another lefty outlet that will skew the truth.

CLAIM: Hillary Clinton successfully defended an accused child rapist and later laughed about the case.

WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer Hillary Rodham was appointed to represent a defendant charged with raping a 12-year-old girl. Clinton reluctantly took on the case, which ended with a plea bargain for the defendant.

WHAT'S FALSE: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.


Very slippery terms that Snopes uses.

What did they leave out that's true? The flip and casual manner in which she discussed the bloody underwear in the trial... which included laughter.

I can understand her doing her job... but the discussion showed a total lack of empathy for the victim.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 08:05 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,129,026 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Snopes is no good anymore. They are another lefty outlet that will skew the truth.

CLAIM: Hillary Clinton successfully defended an accused child rapist and later laughed about the case.

WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer Hillary Rodham was appointed to represent a defendant charged with raping a 12-year-old girl. Clinton reluctantly took on the case, which ended with a plea bargain for the defendant.

WHAT'S FALSE: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.


Very slippery terms that Snopes uses.

What did they leave out that's true? The flip and casual manner in which she discussed the bloody underwear in the trial... which included laughter.

I can understand her doing her job... but the discussion showed a total lack of empathy for the victim.
Sure, sure. If it doesn't agree with your beliefs, it's somehow skewed. This garbage was debunked a long time ago, yet you people seem to love resurrecting this nonsense. Try something real, for once.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 08:25 AM
 
45,631 posts, read 27,250,610 times
Reputation: 23920
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Sure, sure. If it doesn't agree with your beliefs, it's somehow skewed. This garbage was debunked a long time ago, yet you people seem to love resurrecting this nonsense. Try something real, for once.
That has nothing to do with my beliefs.

It's a separate event that occurred that shows her character.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 09:34 AM
 
6,394 posts, read 4,121,935 times
Reputation: 8253
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse
Clinton VOLUNTEERED to take the case. LAUGHED about his getting off.
She neither volunteered nor laughed about it. According to the Bible, bearing false witness violates one of the ten commandments.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top