Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Start citing them, then, because if law enforcement professionals agreed, she would have been charged. The reality is that smoke is often just blowing smoke, and not proof there is a fire.
Even the ridiculous AP report which claimed that as SoS Hillary met with OR spoke to 154 people over 4 years admitted there was no proof of any wrongdoing.
There have already been many posts providing the evidence about pay for play with Hillary while SoS, and you refuse to even acknowledge it.
BTW, the AP report said half of the non-government people Hillary meet with were Clinton Foundation donors.
Not that she only meet with 154 people while SoS.
Again, you completely misrepresent the facts to push a false narrative.
Just one more example of Trump's efforts to benefit from his campaign. It doesn't have to be illegal to be unethical and since he doesn't have an ethical bone in his body it is his usual behavior. Trump is for Trump and nothing else.
It's amazing that some people say that Trump "doesn't have an ethical bone in his body", while completely ignoring the decades of lies, scandals, and corruption of Hillary Clinton.
How can democrats say that with a straight face?
100% democrat hypocrisy.
It doesn't have to be illegal to be unethical. WOW. That's an perfect, exact description of Hillary Clinton.
How many time have we heard that Hillary may have done something borderline illegal, but we should give her a pass because it may have been slightly un-ethical but not illegal?
Smears and rumors, yes. Evidence, nope. Don't you ever get bored with repeating the same old lies?
Are you denying that almost half the non-government officials Hillary meet with were Clinton Foundation donors?
Are you denying that there is documented evidence that Clinton Foundation officials asked Hillary's top aides at the State Department to do favors for, and to "take care of" their donors?
Are you denying that people that went through official channels to meet with Hillary were denied meetings, but if they were Clinton Foundation donors, and went through the foundation, they were given meetings with Hillary right away?
Are you denying that hundreds of million of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation by people that had matters before the State Department?
Are you denying that Bill Clinton gave lucrative speeches at 3-4 times his normal speaking fees to groups that donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that received favorable action by the State Department?
Are you denying that almost half the non-government officials Hillary meet with were Clinton Foundation donors?
Are you denying that there is documented evidence that Clinton Foundation officials asked Hillary's top aides at the State Department to do favors for, and to "take care of" their donors?
Are you denying that people that went through official channels to meet with Hillary were denied meetings, but if they were Clinton Foundation donors, and went through the foundation, they were given meetings with Hillary right away?
Are you denying that hundreds of million of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation by people that had matters before the State Department?
Are you denying that Bill Clinton gave lucrative speeches at 3-4 times his normal speaking fees to groups that donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that received favorable action by the State Department?
Are you denying these verifiable facts?
Yes they are
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.