Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:03 PM
 
34,067 posts, read 17,088,810 times
Reputation: 17213

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
It is very different.

It was entirely legal for Trump to be smart and us dumb taxpayers to foot his bills.

Further if Trump paid taxes he could just release them to prove her wrong.

How can Clinton prove her innocence when not presented with any evidence against her.

This is making the US look like the Gulag.


She will see the evidence when the time is right. The enormous quantity of emails will make that a lengthy process.

 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:03 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,444,403 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Take a look at this link:

5 Inappropriate Sexual Behaviors Not to Tolerate From Supervisors - Law and Daily Life

See #2:

2. Sexual Propositions.

It isn't illegal for a supervisor and employee to have sex, but employees should not be propositioned in a work environment. In fact, "unwelcome sexual advances" is pretty much the hallmark of the classic sexual harassment suit. Even if your supervisor or boss makes a move on you after work or outside the office, if it continues after you've rebuffed him or her, report the incident to your employer

---------------------------------------------

Consensual or not, Bubba had no business propositioning her in the first place. Period.
Just because a 20 something yr old doesn't know she was sexually harassed, doesn't mean the rest of us don't know the law.

Never mind the morality whereby he promised her when he was out of office he was leaving Hillary and riding off into the sunset with her. Yeah right lol.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:04 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
Did you miss the part where they haven't yet read them? Maybe - like you - a few FBI personnel are indulging in wishful thinking?
Explain to me how, if no one has read them, now they know the emails are related to Clinton, and not Weiner, sending dick pics..
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:06 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,444,403 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
Did you miss the part where they haven't yet read them? Maybe - like you - a few FBI personnel are indulging in wishful thinking?
What do you think is the basis for their warrant requesting the ability to read them.

I don't believe for a minute that they are submitting a warrant that says the emails are from Huma Abedin and therefore related to an investigation.

There has to be more than that. That tells me there is something in the Weiner emails they already have a warrant to read that leads them to a warrant for her emails.

What do you suppose that would be since you don't buy my theories?
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:08 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,066,951 times
Reputation: 3884
Do you not understand Comey's words, "In connection with a with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. [meaning the Clinton email and email server investigation Does not matter one iota how they learned, other than it is obvious it from their shared computer.

"Has learned of the existence of emails...". It is clear that Comey is risking his career and any rational person would conclude people do not do that in any job, especially government without real good cause. See Watergate > Deep Throat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
The operative word here is IF. IF, IF, IF. State Dept. business would not have been on his device. Personal emails between him/Huma, yes. His sexting crap, yes. It is HIS device, not hers.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,109,199 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Explain to me how, if no one has read them, now they know the emails are related to Clinton, and not Weiner, sending dick pics..
They did not start the Uma investigation or the Anthony investigation. They reopened the Hillary investigation. My money is on the FBI finding the treasure trove. She's a pathological liar...they tend to like to keep stuff that no-one can find....it gives them pride and a smirky smile. Thieves always bury their most cherished memories. She's not any different. I would believe that the FBI has some pretty smart people.

How bout this, they pursue, she's elected and when Obama and Lynch are gone she is indicted. Smells sweet to me. She may need some help walking down those stairs.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,801,922 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Someone in the FBI reviewed them or else they wouldn't have sent them to Comey and told him he may be interested in them in connection with the investigation of Clinton's use of a private email server.

Most likely, they have been reviewed by the FBI agents working the Carlos Danger investigation. No doubt the agents working the Clinton case were briefed by them and given an overview of whats in the emails.

To think a bunch of seasoned FBI agents just plopped this on the FBI Directors desk is naïve.
Why are they now seeking a warrant to view emails if they have already been reviewed?
Something sounds fishy.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:12 PM
 
27,145 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12073
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
It is very different.

It was entirely legal for Trump to be smart and us dumb taxpayers to foot his bills.

Further if Trump paid taxes he could just release them to prove her wrong.

How can Clinton prove her innocence when not presented with any evidence against her.

This is making the US look like the Gulag.




Didn't hear you complaining when Clinton destroyed subpoenaed evidence that she was withholding.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:13 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,536,509 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
There has to be more than that. That tells me there is something in the Weiner emails they already have a warrant to read that leads them to a warrant for her emails.
That's not how the American judicial system or the 4th amendment works.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 09:15 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,444,403 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
I am saying why are we blaming Clinton for emails on Abekin's computer?

Did Hillary put them there?

Did Hillary give access to Weiner?
Hmmm..........Hillary authorized a private server in her basement thereby telling her subordinates to hell with email security........do whatever is convenient for us and whatever allows us to control release of said emails to anyone asking for them that we don't want to have them. Heck with FOIA.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top