Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Moving; The IPCC is a purely political entity masked as a scientific endeavor setup by the UN no less. Now, apart from the fact that the UN is a discredited, dishonored entity, we are supposed to take seriously a panel set up by the UN?
Here's just a sampling of what is wrong with the IPCC;
There's plenty more regarding the IPCC, a bureaucratic, political organization fronting for the socialist/liberal agenda of "climate change" to keep those billions flowing in.
None of which repudiates the reality of global warming. Even Roger Pielke doesn't repudiate humanity's role in global warming. In any case, I could just as easily pull links that refute the links you've provided, but I think it's pretty clear, sanrene--both in this thread and in many, many past threads on the election-- that you're a dyed-in-the-wool conspiracy theorist. And there is no reasoning with conspiracy theorists.
Al Gore has a patent on the science of "Global Warming Hysteria". He riles up his Kaballah eating bases in Manhattan and Hollywood in order to gain affection from Tom Cruise, the true beholder of the crystal skulls...
More nonsense. I don't really care about Al Gore. I don't get my information on climate change from Al Gore. Al Gore is beside the point.
Great now he's stealing the sun, what a jerk. Maybe he invented that too!
I dunno, best I could do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.