Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And what is your alternative to explain how we got to where we are?
Oooh, ooh...I can tell you...
This very "Big Guy" in the sky, created a guy to look like him and he in turn forfeited one of his ribs to have a mate. Neptune was appointed caretaker of the oceans and Atlas was in charge of holding up the Earth since Adam and his mate were too busy taking care of the dinosaurs.
So an evolutionist can not will not be able to say what was the origin of life is. They just say there is life but can not prove the origin of life.
Something that you can not prove or say you do not acknowledge means you must have some faith that life had an origin. If life did not have an origin then how did we get here?
Correct.
Nor can an astrophysicist, geologist, or a linguist.
None of those fields, like evolutionary biology, addresses the origins of life.
The fact that you think evolution should have something to say about the origin of life merely illustrates that you are quite ignorant as to what constitutes evolutionary biology
so evolution does not explain or care about the origin of life while accepting that humans evolved. But we had to evolve from something and evolution does not address that key issue.
Creationist does state where life comes from .
Yes, it does. Again, you are ignorant of which you speak.
Humans (species of the Homo genus) evolved from Australopethicines.
You are very confused about evolutionary biology. You reject that about which you clearly haven't a clue.
That's abiogenesis, and as far as that goes, there is no "faith", only hypotheses that are being tested,.
Evolution does not depend on HOW life started, only that it did.
This must be your first stint as an online Creationist, because this argument is pretty old...and pointless.
The Theory of Evolution has no explanation for how two sexes "evolved." A Theory must have an explanation for everything it deals with.
Please stop calling people who question TOE "Creationists." That is a straw man that is very easy to knock down. TOE has many open questions, but you will never see a TV program that deals with them. That is why TOE is virtually a matter of faith itself.
The Theory of Evolution has no explanation for how two sexes "evolved." A Theory must have an explanation for everything it deals with.
Please stop calling people who question TOE "Creationists." That is a straw man that is very easy to knock down. TOE has many open questions, but you will never see a TV program that deals with them. That is why TOE is virtually a matter of faith itself.
Of course, what you meant to say was "The Theory of Evolution has no explantion for the evolution of sexes that I won't insist really isn't an explanation".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
