Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, perhaps it was a bad decision to annex it. So many problems!
But I still don't understand the incompetence of the other part. They had twenty years to find a legal solution for the squatters.
Why haven't they done anything? Why?
Tatars are special people.
They in many respects and remained nomads.
For example I have acquaintances who every year (summer) live in mountains with horses is their business (walks on horses). And they there have no house, there are only tents and horses shelters.
The Crimea was informally divided - Tatars didn't let on the coast, and they gradually removed to mountains.
The parliament and businessmen the coast therefore Tatars received mountains or areas in the depth of the island without outlet to the sea (for example Bakhchisarai and others) interested generally only.
They didn't legalize the right for the earth because them never expelled from there...
And the parliament never insisted on legalization, at them never was interest to these sites. And they certainly weren't necessary to investors when there is the southern coast...
"The management of National Geographic held special meeting to decide that to do with the Crimea. Heads held meeting and made the decision that as soon as all legal procedures will come to the end, and the Crimea becomes part of Russia, the territory of the peninsula will designate as the Russian Federation. But while, the Crimea on the National Geographic cards remains part of Ukraine. To show the special status of the territory, the peninsula will allocate with a shadow. Now so allocate only the Gaza Strip"
The Tatars live everywhere in the Crimea. The problem is that they do not want to live in blocks of flats. They prefer land. Many of them have legalised their land. For exaple, Simferopol has become bigger because new districts appeared where the Tatars live. Some districts are not legalised till now, but not only Tatars tried to get land there.
And we have now the raiding beginning in relation to Ukraine.
In Russia blocked an entrance on Roshen factory.
These are my favourite candies....
And the owner "Roshen" Poroshenko by the way is in the lead in presidential race according to social polls.
Unfortunately it is a lie.
Tatars never touched in the Crimea therefore they had no need for legalization.
In Ukraine it costs a lot of money. And Tatars unfortunately aren't among the rich people.
For example our friends built the house (3 floors) and still it didn't legalize because it costs in Kiev now for them 30 thousand dollars...
In the Crimea certainly not such tariffs but after all it is very expensive and inexpedient for Tatars.
Putin didn't accept it back then because he weighed the possible effect it will have with the West, but now that he has done it with Crimea, I think it isn't a big deal to annex Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abzkhia.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)
