Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: First States that should be Redrawn
Ohio/Kentucky/Pennsylvania 4 4.04%
New England States 11 11.11%
Texas 11 11.11%
California 50 50.51%
Other 23 23.23%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2013, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Shaw.
2,226 posts, read 3,857,622 times
Reputation: 846

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
Most people in Virginia wish that Northern Virginia wasn't part of the state. Though its not as bad as the DC suburbs of Maryland since at least southern Virginia is not expected to subsidize NOVA to the extent that rural Maryland subsidizies Montgomery and PG Counties especially transportation and mass transit. The Eastern Shore is self sufficient and suffers high taxes just to support the DC suburbs and Baltimore City. Wihile liberal laws made in the Western Shore hinder economic development and agriculture on the Eastern Shore such as all the laws against septic tank development, all the one size fits all "smart growth" restrictions that make absolutely no sense in small towns, and all the environmental regulations placed on fishing and farming especially.
Yeah, I can't speak for Maryland, but in the case of Virginia, NoVa pays more to the central government than it receives in return (it's the main driver of economic growth). Richmond is smart, though, and invests a lot in NoVa, especially transportation. But we're also nickel-and-dimed in NoVa (a fee to keep an out-of-state car in Arlington, e.g.).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2013, 10:26 AM
 
800 posts, read 781,436 times
Reputation: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by stlouisan View Post
Cincinnati is a Midwestern city, and would not fit in well with Kentucky. It has more in common with Indianapolis, Cleveland, Detroit, Columbus, and St. Louis and Kansas City than with Louisville or Lexington.
We have more in common culturally with Louisville than any of those cities except maybe Indianapolis and St. Louis.

I go to school with people from all of these areas and I'd say without a doubt Louisville is the most similar. Big catholic high schools dominate DI high school football, bourbon most popular drink, country music huge in both, and both have Ohio river culture. Louisville is also closer to Cincinnati than any of those cities by an hour at the very least.

Cincinnati has very little in common with Detroit besides a shared industrial past. Kentucky has greatly influenced Cincinnati and a good percentage of people have ties to that state. Politically, SW Ohio has more in common with KY than it does with the rest of the state and not a lot of people in the area have a favorable view of what happens in Columbus.

Additionally the Enquirer covers UK sports equally if not more than OSU. IU gets no coverage at all in comparison

And Kentuckians tend to be Reds and Bengals fans
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,580 posts, read 2,899,663 times
Reputation: 1717
Combine some of those New England state. They are too small without enough differentiation.

Give Alabama and Georgia some of their rightful parts of the Florida panhandle.

Divide California and Texas into at least a couple of states each.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,421 posts, read 1,637,077 times
Reputation: 1751
Chicago + Burbs from the rest of IL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 12:59 PM
 
Location: MD suburbs of DC
607 posts, read 1,373,594 times
Reputation: 455
Merge the upper portions of Delaware with PA, WV's panhandles should both go into Pennsylvania, everything west of Hagerstown in MD should go to Pennsylvania, NYC and Long Island should go to NJ and either be renamed or the state should be renamed, merge Vermont and New Hampshire, split CA in half, NoVA should merge w/MD, merge the rest of Delaware with MD and VA's Eastern Shores and create a new state (replacing Delaware so 50 states will still remain). Merge the Florida Panhandle with Georgia and Alabama, merge El Paso, TX with New Mexico, and merge TX's upper panhandle with Oklahoma.

Would look a lot smoother this way. ,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2013, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Fairfax County, VA
3,718 posts, read 5,697,643 times
Reputation: 1480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleverfield View Post
Pittsburgh, and Western PA should merge with West Virginia and Pittsburgh should become its new capitol. Southwest Ohio should merge with Kentucky. Northeast Ohio should merge with Western NY and the little slice of PA along lake Erie.
There was once a state proposed that was similar to what you suggest:

Westsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2013, 01:29 PM
 
14,022 posts, read 15,028,594 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by po-boy View Post
Combine some of those New England state. They are too small without enough differentiation.

Give Alabama and Georgia some of their rightful parts of the Florida panhandle.

Divide California and Texas into at least a couple of states each.
Its funny that you propose spitting Texas but Combining the New England states, because Texas, split into several pieces, lets say 3, makes the average Population ~8,600,000 for each new state. New England combined would have nearly 15,000,000 people.
MA- 6,700,000
CT- 3,600,000
NH- 1,300,000
VT- 700,000
RI- 1,100,000
ME- 1,300,000
_________________
14,700,000

Texas- 26,000,000/3
8,600,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2013, 01:49 PM
 
12,766 posts, read 18,381,699 times
Reputation: 8773
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGuyFromCleveland18 View Post
What do you think would be the first state to be redrawn, or the state that most needs to be redrawn.
Long Island/NYC need to seperate from the rest of NYS mostly b/c our state govt sucks and mosty benefits upstate. Having a state of our own would ensure all the revenue benefits us. Also, can we draw in a bridge from LI to CT? We need that. K, thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2013, 03:05 PM
 
462 posts, read 720,584 times
Reputation: 427
Merge some and divide others:

California - definitely needs to split. It's more populous than Canada. North, South, and Interior California. Consider making greater LA a city-state. Give the interior to Nevada.

Texas - Seems like it needs 3 or 4 divisions. East, West, South, and maybe even a panhandle/Plains division (or merge it with Oklahoma - I know, blasphemy)

The High Plains states like Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas? Just make a super-state of 3 million people. Or at least merge the Dakotas. Idaho and Montana could be merged as well.

Florida - South end could go be its own state. Combined with Puerto Rico, South Florida could be a unified Caribbean state.

Alaska - Do the United States even need it anymore? The Cold War and gold rushes are over, and it's so remote. Let it become independent. (at least it will keep Palin from getting elected)

New England - Connecticut and Massachusetts are suitable size. Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire could just as well form a single state and be a regularly sized state like l most of the southern and midwestern states, both in terms of population and area. Rhode Island? Annex it to MA or CT.

West Virginia - needs to take some more counties out of western Virginia, and rename itself "Appalachia".

New York - Make NYC a city-state, annexing all of Connecticut and the north half of New Jersey. South Jersey is still big enough to sustain itself, and holds the capital of the state. Rename Upstate New York "Hudson".

Delaware also seems a little small and obscure. Is it really state-worthy? It can be merged with what is left of New Jersey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Middletown, CT
993 posts, read 1,767,871 times
Reputation: 1098
North and South Dakota could be split East and West. I've always considered western South Dakota to be more similar to western North Dakota than it is to Eastern South Dakota
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top