U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2009, 08:45 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,247,582 times
Reputation: 590

Advertisements

I've read there are many attractive women in Montreal, Canada. I saw maps which show there's a higher ratio of females to males in east coast USA.

From a heterosexual male perspective, rank Boston, NYC, Chicago, Denver, Austin, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. You may consider other cities with a population of at least 500k.

Go less by lists (I've read most), and more by anecdotal evidence. I know it can be subjective. I find many different types of women attractive but to give you an idea of my taste think of Blake Lively or a young Lara Flynn Boyle. I do value other qualities than beauty such as style, friendliness, and knowledge. It's just too complex to go through all that.

Last edited by internat; 01-08-2009 at 08:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2009, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Chicago, Illinois
3,047 posts, read 8,141,279 times
Reputation: 1373
i'd rank them by population, that seems to make the most sense. now if you want to be more specific like you are looking for shallow, plastic women or women who don't shave their arm pits, then the list will be more interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 12:04 PM
 
56,674 posts, read 80,973,859 times
Reputation: 12526
Can't forget Toronto(beautiful and down to earth too), but in the US, I would think college towns would be a good place to look. That's considering that many colleges have more women than men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 12:20 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,247,582 times
Reputation: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by At1WithNature View Post
i'd rank them by population, that seems to make the most sense. now if you want to be more specific like you are looking for shallow, plastic women or women who don't shave their arm pits, then the list will be more interesting.
What about neither type of women? I get your point though. Those are two extremes.

It's very difficult to narrow it down because it's easy to exclude so many. I gave examples of two celebrities to give you an idea of physical appearance and style. Smart casual is alright - definitely closer to chic so during a spring or summer night she may dress like these three http://ilovefancypants.com/news/wp-c.../img_09471.jpg and during fall and winter: http://slimages.macys.com/is/image/M...0.5,0&fmt=jpeg. I don't expect her to walk around like that all the time. I'm just more on the formal side - whether fashion forward or classic matters less. I'm not very shallow. I look women in their eyes and listen to what they have to say. It's important that she can hold an intellectual conversation (not necessarily initially as I know one can appear boring) on either culture, society and world matters. Now it sounds like I demand too much. In reality, I understand one has to compromise to some extent.

Hippie women can be beautiful, and from what I gathered they are more common in Portland and Seattle. But there's a difference between having a modern eco-friendly hippie style to being hobo looking. I'm for equal rights, but against feminism, as much as I'm against chauvinism. I'm more on the agnostic side and not against abortion. I'm by no means against religious people and I would like to have a wife and kids in the future. I should have also written I'm interested in cities with single women in their 20's. Ask away if you need me to be more specific.

Last edited by internat; 01-09-2009 at 01:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Chicago, Illinois
3,047 posts, read 8,141,279 times
Reputation: 1373
I would say that Chicago, Boston, and Seattle would be your best option. in that order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 02:04 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,247,582 times
Reputation: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by At1WithNature View Post
I would say that Chicago, Boston, and Seattle would be your best option. in that order.
Thanks. What do you think of NYC regarding women?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Chicago, Illinois
3,047 posts, read 8,141,279 times
Reputation: 1373
i've only met a few from manhattan. i think they're not as low key as the 3 women in your picture. i think they're more "assertive" if you want to use a kind word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 02:56 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,247,582 times
Reputation: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by At1WithNature View Post
i've only met a few from manhattan. i think they're not as low key as the 3 women in your picture. i think they're more "assertive" if you want to use a kind word.
Well, that was just a random Google images search on "chic women".

Assertive can be positive. Sure, it can refer to someone who is aggressive and rude.

It's good if you're also thinking of opinionated women who are straightforward with their feelings. Assertive women can be strong and independent which I think are positive qualities.

I don't know many young men today that look for women that feel the need to play the housewife role. I don't look for a submissive woman lacking in ambition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
366 posts, read 1,177,452 times
Reputation: 241
Denver has to be the worst place for meeting single women! Its seems like there are 24657230 guys for every decent woman!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2009, 04:48 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,247,582 times
Reputation: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew303 View Post
Denver has to be the worst place for meeting single women! Its seems like there are 24657230 guys for every decent woman!
That doesn't sound too good! I've actually read about that on C-D. Like I wrote before there are more males than females in western U.S cities. Check out for yourself: A singles map of the United States of America - The Boston Globe

There's also a thread on the subject: Cities with best male-female ratio (25-35)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top