Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2015, 08:42 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,563 posts, read 81,131,933 times
Reputation: 57767

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
Businesses are a privilege to own no one has a right to own one. This means if you own a business you are not entitled to do whatever you want you have to do what you want. Society not you as a business owner can set certain things.If you can not pay an employee enough to live on and other people have to pay for them that just show how entitled and selfish the business owner is. If you can not pay an employee much then here is a thought you do not need that job in your business but providing a job just so can pay someone as little as possible is not okay.
Business owners are not paying people to support them financially. They are hired and paid to help them get the work done so that they can make a profit. A business owner has an obligation to their family to make as much as they can, and that means paying employees as little as they have to. Just as a CEO and their managers are obligated to minimize payroll costs to maximize profits for the shareholders. People who want to make $15 or more need to acquire the skills to get a job that pays more. When I had my business for 16 years I paid well over minimum ($12 in 2004) but hired people with skills who produced and provided value in their production. Most were college students.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2015, 09:15 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,614,322 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
If the minimum wage is so low that a person working full time, or nearly full time needs to rely on social service benefits to sustain themselves then it needs to be raised. I think we either raise it, or we should tax employers for every single penny of thet money that is distributed to their employees in welfare, eitc and food stamps

Or government taxes need to be reduced/eliminated for those individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,845 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34056
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
Or government taxes need to be reduced/eliminated for those individuals.
With the amount of money they make, they pay so little income tax that lowering it wouldn't make any significant difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 09:22 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,614,322 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
With the amount of money they make, they pay so little income tax that lowering it wouldn't make any significant difference.

Every little bit helps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,845 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Business owners are not paying people to support them financially. They are hired and paid to help them get the work done so that they can make a profit. A business owner has an obligation to their family to make as much as they can, and that means paying employees as little as they have to.
And I have a right to refuse to spend my money at a business that is not socially responsible, and there are more and more people who are doing exactly that. Look at the dump McDonald's is taking, do you think people quit eating hamburgers all of a sudden, or could it be that people would rather spend their money at a place like in-n-out that pays and treats it's employees well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 12:23 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,273,411 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Business owners are not paying people to support them financially. They are hired and paid to help them get the work done so that they can make a profit. A business owner has an obligation to their family to make as much as they can, and that means paying employees as little as they have to. Just as a CEO and their managers are obligated to minimize payroll costs to maximize profits for the shareholders. People who want to make $15 or more need to acquire the skills to get a job that pays more. When I had my business for 16 years I paid well over minimum ($12 in 2004) but hired people with skills who produced and provided value in their production. Most were college students.
Last time I checked one reason people work jobs is to make enough to support themselves financially so yes they are that is how it has been for a long time. Just like a business owner has an obligation to their families the employees have obligations to their families to make enough to provide for themselves and their families but it only matters if the owner does is that right? So why does a business owner have to pay as little as possible to feed their families? If you are a good business owner you should be able to make enough for yourself and your employees but you just want to make excuses for business owners to be greedy. So what happens when all the employees get more skills and move up who is going to work for the business and how is the business going to prosper no one is there to work for them? You do not seem to be living in reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 07:28 AM
 
2,752 posts, read 2,584,244 times
Reputation: 4046
Quote:
So what happens when all the employees get more skills and move up who is going to work for the business and how is the business going to prosper no one is there to work for them? You do not seem to be living in reality.
Actually that's how capitalism works. Workers vote with their feet. The business has a job for a set amount of pay, If he has no takers for the job, He raises the amount of pay for the job or eliminates the position or closes his doors. That's what happens when you have a vibrant economy and business are fighting over workers. Unlike this pathetic one where we have 100 million able body workers with no jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 08:51 AM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,797,639 times
Reputation: 6550
In a nutshell, what really bothers me is that we start at the top with owner and/or executives down through line managers saying "it's overhead; we just have to pull their pay from overall revenues" until we get down to the line workers and then suddenly it is "we can't pay them more than what comes in the door based solely on their contribution". Some examples of why I think they should be treated in a similar manner... Being open late brings more customers in at all hours because a place becomes their "go to", so even though the late shift employees have less sales, they help the overall revenue increase. Having the most locations has a similar effect, but some locations won't do well. In manufacturing, having a wide range of products in the line/industry you primarily target helps the overall bottom line even though some products are difficult to produce at a profit when scrutinized individually. Treat people like they are part of your overall business and if you cannot afford to pay them enough, then your overall business has a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,845 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34056
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
In a nutshell, what really bothers me is that we start at the top with owner and/or executives down through line managers saying "it's overhead; we just have to pull their pay from overall revenues" until we get down to the line workers and then suddenly it is "we can't pay them more than what comes in the door based solely on their contribution". Some examples of why I think they should be treated in a similar manner... Being open late brings more customers in at all hours because a place becomes their "go to", so even though the late shift employees have less sales, they help the overall revenue increase. Having the most locations has a similar effect, but some locations won't do well. In manufacturing, having a wide range of products in the line/industry you primarily target helps the overall bottom line even though some products are difficult to produce at a profit when scrutinized individually. Treat people like they are part of your overall business and if you cannot afford to pay them enough, then your overall business has a problem.
You nailed it, It's an accounting trick, no matter how much execs get in pay and bonuses it's just a 'cost of doing business', it's not until you get to regular employees that you hear how their pay is hurting the "bottom line"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 01:50 PM
 
2,752 posts, read 2,584,244 times
Reputation: 4046
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
You nailed it, It's an accounting trick, no matter how much execs get in pay and bonuses it's just a 'cost of doing business', it's not until you get to regular employees that you hear how their pay is hurting the "bottom line"
Because some are easier to replace then others. Hard to replace = more value = $$. Want more money, become more valuable to your employer. 100 million people are looking for work, thousands crossing the border everyday. H1-B looking to take your job, for the same pay, you have now. We are all replaceable, so do what you can to make it harder to pull that trigger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top