Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2018, 09:52 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,918,932 times
Reputation: 8743

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
Lots of Jews in Spain also...before the Inquisition.
Lots of Jews afterward too, but they converted to Christianity or pretended to (became marranos or converses). Jews who convert are still genetically Jews.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2018, 10:33 PM
 
1,568 posts, read 1,119,188 times
Reputation: 1676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Siegel View Post
Mexico never had African slavery outside of the extreme southeast, so I don't think Mexico is a very black country either. The overwhelming genetic heritage is American Indian (I don't know what else to call them), plus Spanish with a sprinkle of Irish, German, and other Europeans. And now a few Chinese.

Actually Mexico had a larger black population than the united states, but since they had no one drop rule they bred themselves out of existence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32940
I get the sense that whites wanted to use the one drop rule when it was to their advantage, but now that Blacks (and some other groups) are using it to their advantage, whites don't like the concept.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 04:00 AM
 
1,568 posts, read 1,119,188 times
Reputation: 1676
Being that the average African American is somewhere between 65-80% sub Saharan African that means we are also 20-35% European, that means many people we call half black are really closer to 1/4 black(or more accurately 5/8's white) genetically. so I would say the one drop rule is in play.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 04:30 AM
 
11,445 posts, read 10,483,449 times
Reputation: 6283
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphorx View Post
Being that the average African American is somewhere between 65-80% sub Saharan African that means we are also 20-35% European, that means many people we call half black are really closer to 1/4 black(or more accurately 5/8's white) genetically. so I would say the one drop rule is in play.
Big difference between being 40% black and 2% black
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
15,218 posts, read 10,315,114 times
Reputation: 32198
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
What I find interesting is exemplified by a certain truly mixed race television actor who is half Black and half Russian/Polish/Jew...and is working so hard to be seen as "just Black", ignoring one whole side of his family. Don't get me wrong...I believe people should be free to self-identify. I just find the drive some people have to claim only one heritage to be an interesting phenomenon.
Exactly! This is what bugged me about President Obama. He is 50% white but played up his black heritage and ignored his white heritage. He was called our first "black" president when in reality, he should have referred to as our first "mixed-race" president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:30 AM
 
28,667 posts, read 18,788,917 times
Reputation: 30964
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiluvr1228 View Post
Exactly! This is what bugged me about President Obama. He is 50% white but played up his black heritage and ignored his white heritage. He was called our first "black" president when in reality, he should have referred to as our first "mixed-race" president.
Is that really what bugged you about Obama?

Obama was born in 1961, when his parents' marriage was still illegal in 16 states.

He was a grown man before the concept of "biracial" even began to any social meaning in the US. Why should he have claimed "biracial" when all his life people had called him "black?" There was no good in calling himself "mixed-race."

There still is no voting constituency for "mixed race."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:34 AM
 
28,667 posts, read 18,788,917 times
Reputation: 30964
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
What I find interesting is exemplified by a certain truly mixed race television actor who is half Black and half Russian/Polish/Jew...and is working so hard to be seen as "just Black", ignoring one whole side of his family. Don't get me wrong...I believe people should be free to self-identify. I just find the drive some people have to claim only one heritage to be an interesting phenomenon.
Inasmuch as you don't see him at home, you don't know that he's "ignoring one whole side of his family."

Or, maybe like Meghan Markle, he has some good reasons for ignoring one whole side of his family.

What you see is that he's supporting the side that is socially weakest, because he knows the strong side is okay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,386 posts, read 8,152,322 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post
Is that really what bugged you about Obama?

Obama was born in 1961, when his parents' marriage was still illegal in 16 states.

He was a grown man before the concept of "biracial" even began to any social meaning in the US. Why should he have claimed "biracial" when all his life people had called him "black?" There was no good in calling himself "mixed-race."

There still is no voting constituency for "mixed race."

I clearly remember the barbershop conversation howls at Tiger Woods (born 1975) biracial claims when he was a beginning PGA tour pro
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Oort cloud
167 posts, read 190,571 times
Reputation: 633
Why have we become so obsessed with labels nowadays especially in the US?
I remember, not too long ago, where in attempts to reconcile differences we all focused on the things that made us similar. Now, we focus on what makes us different. We want to be labeled different. We don't want to associate with the rest. There's hardly anymore Americans growing up. We're all hispanic, panamanian transgender, democratic, socialist, prochoice or we're white, german, males republican NRA members. (just fictitious examples) That in of itself is an issue, IMO. Whenever something comes up on the news; black male did this. White male did that.
Rant over.


I think the one drop rule is absurd. It is such an obvious remnant of pre-civil rights era US and I have no clue why people continue to even dignify it. Another poster did mention it was previously used against blacks and has now somehow been flipped and is some afrocentric concept. Back then, black blood was vile poisonous that it taints the whole lot. Now, it's great and powerful and overtakes the whole lot. If we use it today,why are we only focusing on african blood though? Why not asian, why not white? What does one drop of asian blood do? What does one drop of white blood do? Why doesn't one drop of asian blood taint a pure african lot? Why can't this concept just die already.

I have heard some other bizzare claims of what determines race. My wife is black, her brother obviously black, but his wife is white. I was told that the brother's wife was told by her doctor, in clear terms, that her children are black because the father is black. In essense, whatever the father is is what the children are. Nothing else matters. I don't know what kind of quack he was but I see nothing medical about that opinion. Or perhaps it's just some kind of mental gymnastics they came up with to determine their identity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top