Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2008, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Heartland Florida
9,324 posts, read 26,771,735 times
Reputation: 5039

Advertisements

This may be speculation, but I have noticed that many countries with extreme poverty that have a Christian faith are Catholic. I have also noticed that when the influence of the Church wanes, as in Europe, that economic conditions improve. Is this unfounded speculation or is there some truth in this? A theory I have is that uncontrolled population growth is encouraged by the Church and so is poverty of the masses. While religion in general tends to depress the innovation of individuals, it seems that this particular faith has a history of causing much suffering in the Western world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2008, 11:25 AM
 
Location: San Diego
2,521 posts, read 2,352,542 times
Reputation: 1298
All religious nations are prone to poverty. Look at the US as an example. The more secular an area, the more prosperous it is.

It's probably because religious people sit around and pray for things to happen, secular people actually go out and do them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 11:28 AM
 
1,788 posts, read 4,758,059 times
Reputation: 1253
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftydan6 View Post
It's probably because religious people sit around and pray for things to happen, secular people actually go out and do them.
I think you hit the nail on the head right there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 11:30 AM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,199,764 times
Reputation: 46685
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftydan6 View Post
All religious nations are prone to poverty. Look at the US as an example. The more secular an area, the more prosperous it is.

It's probably because religious people sit around and pray for things to happen, secular people actually go out and do them.
Actually, per capita income in the United States has widened significantly over that of Western Europe over the past 30 years, typically by a factor of 15-20%.

Source? Cowboy Capitalism, by Olaf Gersemann, respected economics writer of the Financial Times.

Now, back to the original point of the thread, it's really hard to refute that. I'm not sure of the underlying causes, whether Catholicism flourished in Mediterranean and Slavic cultures, whereas Protestantism is predominant in Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and Scandinavian cultures. If the reverse had been true, would we be asking if Protestant countries were prone to poverty?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,064,517 times
Reputation: 4125
I don't think religion specifically has an influence on poverty, but there are defiantly factors that drive it that are part of religious beliefs. One of the big ones is huge families, where opportunities for additional education (college) are unaffordable by the family...or if it is a predominate view in the culture can drive down wages as more and more people compete for the same jobs.

Innovation is a another definite thing pushed back by religious beliefs, every new technology or different cultural norm is denounced by groups due to religious beliefs. If we look back in the past medicine, astronomy, and physics were delayed for centuries due to beliefs and denouements by religious authorities...imagine what technology level humanity would be at now if we embraced new ideas and change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Whiteville Tennessee
8,262 posts, read 18,496,644 times
Reputation: 10150
Catholics not believing in birth control could be a factor. Having more kids than you can afford would add to the areas poverty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 12:08 PM
 
Location: San Diego
2,521 posts, read 2,352,542 times
Reputation: 1298
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
Actually, per capita income in the United States has widened significantly over that of Western Europe over the past 30 years, typically by a factor of 15-20%. ?
Per capita income is not a measure of poverty. All that measures is total money divided by total people, which is not an exact science. In that same time, the income disparity of the US has skyrocketed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 12:30 PM
 
Location: West Texas
2,449 posts, read 5,953,691 times
Reputation: 3125
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftydan6 View Post
It's probably because religious people sit around and pray for things to happen, secular people actually go out and do them.
And once again ignorance rears its ugly head.

There are several factors contributing to poverty and religion in specific regions. In South America, there was a heavy Spanish influence. After Columbus returned from the "New World" in 1493, Spain and Portugual had been at each others throats for a long time. Upon announcing his new "discoveries" the pope at the time (Pope Alexander) split the New World between the two nations (both heavy in Catholic religion). As they Spanish and Portugese began expanding into the new world, so did the new religion. When the two nations left the New World, they left half-civilized countries with only faith and power vacuums. Those that were powerful enough to take control of those countries laid the foundation for the corruption that is still rampant in most of them. That left only religion for most of the population to hold on to, especially in current time where they (the countries) have developed militaries.

For Asia, it must also be understood that those that are predominantly Catholic (Philippines - approximately 83%) was also under Spanish control during the 9th and 15th centuries until the Philippine-American War (1899-1902).

It's also no suprise that much of Africa has Catholic populations as the religion spread from Europe south through Morocco, Libya, Egypt and others. It continue to spread even as Islam began to spread from the Middle East westward through Persia (present day Iran), Iraq, and Saudi Arabia west into Africa.

Many of the impovershed countries are impovershed because of corrupt governments, not because of an adoption of religion. The two are mutually exclusive in the fact that they did not breed from each other. In fact, Christianity (specifically the Catholic faith) is based on the spread of religions to those countries from richer first world societies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 01:08 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,199,764 times
Reputation: 46685
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftydan6 View Post
Per capita income is not a measure of poverty. All that measures is total money divided by total people, which is not an exact science. In that same time, the income disparity of the US has skyrocketed.
You're talking around the point. The United States populace not only enjoys greater per capita income, but our material prosperity remains higher than even industrialized countries, when you compare working class to working class. The real deal here is that you made a sweeping, uninformed opinion, and I called you on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,064,517 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathagos View Post
Many of the impovershed countries are impovershed because of corrupt governments, not because of an adoption of religion. The two are mutually exclusive in the fact that they did not breed from each other. In fact, Christianity (specifically the Catholic faith) is based on the spread of religions to those countries from richer first world societies.
I don't think secular or religious societies are bad, let people worship what they want if it's not hurting anyone else, but I do think religion and government are bad in bed together. I think having the two as one is more corrupting because it further consolidates power to fewer people.

Not only do you break the law where a leader is of both spheres of influence, what you have done is a sin (sucks for speeders). You can't debate or disagree with a political decision, because it's heresy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top