Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2010, 05:50 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,864,685 times
Reputation: 2731

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
Maybe it's because CAE tried to kill CHS's and GSP's chance at landing Southwest Airlines. Good thing that plan failed.
What goes around comes around.

The whole Boyd plan is hysterical. "Just bring in larger planes to lower the fares".
Hello....you have to have people to fly on those larger planes.....people are not flying from CAE, the whole reason Columbia has small planes now and is fourth in passenger numbers in the state. What business travelers are flying regularly to Columbia? Certainly not state government officials or USC students. Ft. Jackson personnel maybe a little.

Apparently, CAE is back to sucking off the taxpayer and trying to get a 10 million federal grant to help subsidize airlines. Guess they can't do it on their own. The story of Columbia......rely on taxpayer dollars / government. How sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
11,706 posts, read 24,797,602 times
Reputation: 3449
CAE got pissed off when GSP and CHS tried to use tax incentives to land Southwest which thankfully weren't needed but now they think it's ok to use tax incentives to bring in lower airfares themselves. Talk about hypocritical. I'm sick and tired of the federal government wasting our tax dollars on stupid things like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 05:00 AM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
12,924 posts, read 18,770,297 times
Reputation: 3141
Those are federal aviation dollars, the dollars GSP and Charleston should have gone after instead of thinking it was ok to have Midlands taxpayers ponying up for something that in the opinion of every Greenville booster on here is going to hurt the Midlands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 05:31 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,864,685 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbiadata View Post
Those are federal aviation dollars, the dollars GSP and Charleston should have gone after instead of thinking it was ok to have Midlands taxpayers ponying up for something that in the opinion of every Greenville booster on here is going to hurt the Midlands.
Neither GSP or Charleston received any tax dollars. Southwest chose to enter both cities with NO taxpayers subsidies. Why can't Columbia land more air service without subsidies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
11,706 posts, read 24,797,602 times
Reputation: 3449
National debt soars: http://content.usatoday.com/communit...l-since-wwii/1

Spend, spend, spend...that's the Democrats way of life. What's another $10 million for the Columbia Airport?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 10:55 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,874,493 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
I'm sick and tired of the federal government wasting our tax dollars on stupid things like this.
But you thought it was OK when state government wanted to use incentives for airlines for Greenville and Charleston? It's really hard to take anything you say seriously when you're "talking" politics.

The fact of the matter is that the South in general can't keep heavily relying on incentives for economic development (whether it be airlines, BMW, Boeing, etc.) forever. We despise welfare for individuals but love it for corporations. Our days are numbered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
National debt soars: http://content.usatoday.com/communit...l-since-wwii/1

Spend, spend, spend...that's the Democrats way of life. What's another $10 million for the Columbia Airport?
No, that's the federal government's "way of life," period. If you're just blaming it on Dems, then you haven't been around for very long. Furthermore, do you even know whether DOT grants are considered deficit spending or if they are paid for? You probably don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 04:07 PM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,864,685 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
National debt soars: National debt soars to highest level since WWII - On Politics: Covering the US Congress, Governors, and the 2010 Election - USATODAY.com

Spend, spend, spend...that's the Democrats way of life. What's another $10 million for the Columbia Airport?
G-man....you helped Obambi into office. This is what we get when an unqualified, dishonest person like Obambi takes office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 04:21 PM
 
1,941 posts, read 4,470,923 times
Reputation: 971
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
G-man....you helped Obambi into office. This is what we get when an unqualified, dishonest person like Obambi takes office.
I thought the same thing! He was one of the forum's biggest supporters of the TOTUS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
12,924 posts, read 18,770,297 times
Reputation: 3141
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
Neither GSP or Charleston received any tax dollars. Southwest chose to enter both cities with NO taxpayers subsidies. Why can't Columbia land more air service without subsidies?
Duh, I was talking about the fact that GSP and Charleston wanted money from the state and threw a temper tantrum when Midlands lawmakers didn't want Midlands tax payers to have to pay for something that Citydata Greenville boosters say will ruin air service to Columbia. CAE is asking the right funding source for the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 05:17 PM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,864,685 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbiadata View Post
CAE is asking the right funding source for the money.
The Federal government is just plain broke/busted/out of moolah. Have you watched the news? CAE is not asking the right funding source......Columbia and CAE should work on getting private business to set-up headquarters and facilities in the city so airlines could fly to CAE without government support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top