Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If a majority of voters were upset about the court's unconstitutional ruling they could have demonstrated that when Jerry Brown ran for Governor. What did they do? They elected him Governor.
That's because in recent years Calif. has turned into a liberal state with the most illegal aliens in it of all states and their advocates.
That's because in recent years Calif. has turned into a liberal state with the most illegal aliens in it of all states and their advocates.
Oh, please ... not that baseless argument. People have been whining about California being a "liberal" state for a very long time. It's not as if the whine is something new. And in case you don't understand the law, "illegal aliens" don't have the right to vote.
It's right here in the article" Citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling and federal law, the guidance letter and a fact sheet inform school officials that they may not prevent children from enrolling if they lack a birth certificate or Social Security number. Schools also may not bar a child from enrolling if a parent declines to provide the child’s race or ethnicity on forms, the documents say."
It's federal law, like it or not. Where I am, Texas, we have tons of Hispanic kids who enroll. They only need to prove that they live in the district. I had my child in the district for several years. Had to prove that she lived where she did, did not have to provide a social if I didn't want to.
No, they are strict about proving residence. Have to have proof through an electricity bill or something similar. People still lie, though. But illegal kids are still allowed to attend our schools. You don't have to lie about that.
^But that gets waived. Some years back, The Washington Post in one of their regular illegal alien sob stories, wrote about an illegal who lived in a flophouse filled with about 20 people. She had no proof of residence since none of the utility bills were in her name. So she didn't register her kids for school. Someone noticed her kids running around outside when school was in session so she came to the attention of the authorities. She told them her sob story and arrangements were made to enroll her kids in school!
Did you feel similarly about John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t, Ed Meese and other AGs in times past?
I don't know about you but for me it doesn't matter which party an AG belongs to. What matters is if s/he respects the laws. Holder certainly does not have respect for the laws.
Oh, please ... not that baseless argument. People have been whining about California being a "liberal" state for a very long time. It's not as if the whine is something new. And in case you don't understand the law, "illegal aliens" don't have the right to vote.
It's not baseless at all. I know, I live in Calif. and watched the transformation in our state over the years. Why do you consider opposition to illegal immigration "a whine"? I never said anything about illegal aliens being able to vote (even though there is evidence that some do). It is the Hispanic citizen vote that our politicians are falling over themselves for by promising amnesty for their illegal brethren. We have a large Hispanic population here both legal and illegal. Any attempts to deter illegal immigration in our state or to reduce their access to benefits is met with vehement opposition by their advocates.
Let's not confuse folks ... with facts. It's easier to make unwarranted accusations against " ... Holder and his boys ..."
If talking about Jim Crow: I'd refer to Bull Connor and his boys too. Sometimes I think Holder and his kind are the kids of Connor and his kind with their prejudice against certain Americans. Black people in 1964 and Black, white, and so on people in 2014 who ain't anchor babies.
Did you feel similarly about John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t, Ed Meese and other AGs in times past?
As a matter of fact, yes I do. The problem with the present AG is that he is totally driven by politics for the good of his party. Additionally, the lies he puts forth show that he is not interested in the laws but only his own opinions and attempts to twist the laws to suit his agenda.
So, then ... the majority of voters in the United States that selected/elected Mr. Obama to serve a second term are "ignorant stupid and naive"? They're "brainwashed"? Hmmm ...
To a degree, yes. They believed what they were told (and not told about his actions) instead of doing the research for themselves.
Yeah as much as a lot of people don't like the fact that illegal aliens can go to public school in the US their is nothing we can do to stop them. The law is on their side unless we deport their parents or give the businesses that are causing this problem excessive fines. That's the only way to solve this problem and prevent it from happening but our government doesn't seem to want to do that (and hasn't done it for decades). Then again the people hurt by these policies the most no one cares about them. Thane Krios would call wall working class and impoverished Americans the drala fa (the ignored).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How do they handle
