Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh SHUCKS !! When I spotted this thread, I figured some intelligent judge had come down with a ruling forbidding the "use" of illegal aliens. "GOOD !!", I thought....."if we can't 'use' them, they'll have to leave".
Boy, was I mistaken ! The judge doesn't care if employers "use" illegals..(in fact, he FAVORS it). He just doesn't like us to "use" that term to describe them....
(Sigh)...English can be a VERY CONFUSING language...
I'm pretty certain that I read somewhere that this is false.
I also doubt this is true because it'll infringe upon the right of free speech.
So is it true or is it false? Which one do you believe?
These banned terms only apply to the AZ courts, from what I gather in the link provided. It does not mean the entire nation. I believe it is a step in the right direction when determining if the defendant is guilty or innocent. When using those negative terms it can influence people to side on "guilty" even before a trial. It can also influence the courts to throw the whole law book vs giving a fair sentence.
What is the problem with that? If he is guilty, he will serve his time and then get deported. If he is innocent of all charges, he will be released on the other side of the border.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.