Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-24-2016, 01:47 PM
 
106,691 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80169

Advertisements

The mere reason you are trying to compare apples to oranges and do not understand what the properties of a core fund should have says do not give advice to others.

Nothing personal but betting the ranch on long term treasury's and junk bonds is not the purpose of a core holding.

A core fund is one you can hold for decades if you like without having to time out of it.
For a conservative core i like fidelity balanced or fidelity puritan. Many retirees use vanguard wellesly . S&p 500 or total market funds make good cores

Last edited by mathjak107; 05-24-2016 at 01:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2016, 01:55 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
You may be right, or maybe not.
Let's see in a year, what return has been produced by the following:


PCN (40%)
NAZ (40%)
HDGE (20%)


and compare that to wellington, contra, etc.


I'll bet it's in the same general neighborhood!

So hdge ytd -4.28, 2015 -5.86, 2014 -10.42, 2013 -30.31, 2012 -26.82

S&p over that same time 1.74, 1.38, 13.69, 32.39 and 16

Let's also hope Arizona doesn't run into any problems. I guess core holding don't need to consider concentration risk especially considering maturities and geographic location
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
The mere reason you are trying to compare apples to oranges and do not understand what the properties of a core fund should have says do not give advice to others.

Nothing personal but betting the ranch on long term treasury's and junk bonds is not the purpose of a core holding.

A core fund is one you can hold for decades if you like without having to time out of it

Remember the line from "Wall Street"...... "The value of information. I don't care where or how you get it. Just get it".


I'll alter that to read: All I care about is the bottom line, making $$.
I don't care how you do that.
There are many different ways. I respect your knowledge MJ but your way is not the only way.


Many different ways to invest:
* Mutual Fund Set it and forget it
* Trades and more trades
* Stocks
* Bonds
* Short sales (for me....rarely)
* Futures (even I'm not crazy enough to dabble here)
* Options (see above - I don't play this game either)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 01:58 PM
 
106,691 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80169
We are not disputing how YOU make your money. We are disputing the advice you give to others. Recomending high volatility , leveraged non diversified bond funds to folks is a very poor idea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
So hdge ytd -4.28, 2015 -5.86, 2014 -10.42, 2013 -30.31, 2012 -26.82

S&p over that same time 1.74, 1.38, 13.69, 32.39 and 16

Let's also hope Arizona doesn't run into any problems. I guess core holding don't need to consider concentration risk especially considering maturities and geographic location

Agree. HDGE is only in there because market appears to be at a top
Used Arizona Muni Fund rather than the spend first ask questions later states like NY, CA, IL etc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:04 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Agree. HDGE is only in there because market appears to be at a top
Used Arizona Muni Fund rather than the spend first ask questions later states like NY, CA, IL etc
Do you understand concentration risk?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Do you understand concentration risk?

I do.
There's risk in every single investment you can make. Every one. I don't mind a little state wide risk here -- Arizona is a conservative growing state. They will pay their bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:23 PM
 
106,691 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80169
Not every investment has much risk. Many have volatility and little risk. Riding market cycles up and down like an s&p fund is not risky it is volatile.

You can make it risky by using long term investments for short term purposes . Do you really think you will lose money 20-30 years later in the s&p ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:23 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
I do.
There's risk in every single investment you can make. Every one. I don't mind a little state wide risk here -- Arizona is a conservative growing state. They will pay their bills.


They will pay their bills until they don't. You are foolishly chasing past returns sticking to one state only and eliminating such a high level of concetration risk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2016, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Not every investment has much risk. Many have volatility and little risk. Riding market cycles up and down like an s&p fund is not risky it is volatile.

You can make it risky by using long term investments for short term purposes

That's exactly what people were saying in '06 / '07 / '08.....
There's no risk in real estate. Prices always go up!
And who would have thought that one of the big 5 investment banks (Lehman) would simply disappear? And the same fate would have happened to two others - Merrill and Bear Stearns....if the gov't hadn't stepped in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top