Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am 22. I have around 25k in my 401k and 25k in my roth ira. Nearly 95% is in some sort of stock. Should I switch to 70% bonds?
Only if you have a panic attack every night and newscaster says the Dow Jones is down. Conventional wisdom says you are right where you should be for the next 20 plus years
This. If you take away nothing else from this board please retain this: over time stocks outperform bonds by a large margin. You have 40 years, do not even consider bonds for the next 20+.
I am 22. I have around 25k in my 401k and 25k in my roth ira. Nearly 95% is in some sort of stock. Should I switch to 70% bonds?
You are setup perfect for your age. If you have 30+ years for retirement, go stock heavy. You can handle some up and downs. I sit at 95% as well and I am age 30.
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,080 posts, read 7,527,706 times
Reputation: 9814
We have enough. We are retired.
The Discretionary Trading accounts are all over the place in Stock/Cash. The taxable acct is nearly fully invested in dividend stocks and pretty static - I want the LTCG and dividends. The IRA accounts and Roth accounts are opportunistic, smallcap-value-momentum. The Roths have a bit more cash because we are looking to relocate and buy.
We hold no bonds. Deferred annuities perform that function.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.