Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2012, 06:32 AM
 
1,606 posts, read 2,961,031 times
Reputation: 1710

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
"Yes officer, I was passing EVERYONE!"

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Let ME worry about that. I don't need you and GPSM enforcing the law for the officers.

Sent from my Apple Mac Pro tower using my keyboard because I'm not too lazy to type
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2012, 06:39 AM
 
2,630 posts, read 4,995,795 times
Reputation: 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gpsma View Post
With the volume of traffic, the "left lane for passing" scenario is hardly workable in this environment.
Total BS. It's workable in ANY scenario. It's how the roads were designed to be used. People here just DON'T use it, weren't taught it and argue about it as though their persistent denial somehow makes them right. Speed and lane usage are both rules of the road. That one is enforced and the other isn't is just short sighted stupidity.

You have your right to your opinion on speed limits and that's fine. You don't have a right to advocate that proper lane usage is unworkable or doesn't matter. Of course in bumper to bumper traffic it isn't pertinent, but that is the exception, not the rule.

If they started handing out tickets for driving too slow in the passing lane, there would be fewer people passing on the right, less tailgating and fewer accidents. That's a fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 07:27 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,970,654 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by pidge1114 View Post
Let ME worry about that. I don't need you and GPSM enforcing the law for the officers.

Sent from my Apple Mac Pro tower using my keyboard because I'm not too lazy to type
When you drive like that you are putting not only yourself in danger but everyone around you. I hope you don't have kids and play speed racer with them in the car.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 07:32 AM
 
1,606 posts, read 2,961,031 times
Reputation: 1710
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
When you drive like that you are putting not only yourself in danger but everyone around you. I hope you don't have kids and play speed racer with them in the car.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
how come i only put everyone in danger at 65mph on the LIE, but not on other highways where the speed limit is higher? 55mph is not a magical safe speed. jesus christ.

I also don't get how I "legally" can go 55mph through intersections on local roads, where there are plenty of opportunities for people to also legally pull out into traffic, making right turns on red, etc. I saw it all the time on Deer Park Avenue, where 55 was the limit, but people were pulling into traffic from every direction. Yet there wasn't mass carnage all over the road.

Last edited by pidge1114; 08-22-2012 at 07:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 08:17 AM
 
3,686 posts, read 8,702,873 times
Reputation: 1807
Increases in speed lead to more fatal accidents. We need to keep it at 55 and enforce that limit. I feel driving at 55 is my choice...I choose to obey the law and to drive safely. Its only your impatience that makes you want to drive any faster because as i have shown, time and again, you dont save any significant time. So drive slower and be safer, you will get where you are going in plenty of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 09:50 AM
 
97 posts, read 98,031 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by pidge1114 View Post
Let ME worry about that. I don't need you and GPSM enforcing the law for the officers.

Sent from my Apple Mac Pro tower using my keyboard because I'm not too lazy to type
Agreed I can't stand drivers that take it upon themselves to enforce the speed limit. If you can't keep up with the flow of traffic, move to the right... Or take a bus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Baywood NY
134 posts, read 250,689 times
Reputation: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gpsma View Post
Increases in speed lead to more fatal accidents. We need to keep it at 55 and enforce that limit. I feel driving at 55 is my choice...I choose to obey the law and to drive safely. Its only your impatience that makes you want to drive any faster because as i have shown, time and again, you dont save any significant time. So drive slower and be safer, you will get where you are going in plenty of time.
Again there are more dangerous roads then the LIE that has 55 mph speed limits. Deer Park Avenue,RT 347 , RT 454 that have 55 mph speed limits The LIE could easily have the speed limit raised to 65 mph for most of its length. Most drivers in the area feel more comfortable around 65 mph. If you want to drive slower drive in the middle or right lanes that is what it is for. Left lane should be passing only and you should NOT cruise in the left lane at 55 mph.

What they should do is do a study raise the speed limit to 65 mph from Exit 40 to Exit 73 and have a study done to see if fatalities or accidents go up or not if they don't then the speed limit should be kept at 65 mph if not then they should lower it back to 55 mph.

Utah DOT (UDOT) Did just this.
Utah DOT: No Downside to 80 MPH Speed Limit Increase | The Truth About Cars
They found NO INCREASE in accidents or fatalities along this stretch. Just because you like driving at 55 mph and some how it makes you feel magically safer doesn't mean it is actually safer. The 55 mph was enacted in 1974 to save gas during the oil crisis not safety

I feel though that no matter what I or anyone says in this thread you will never change your mind but if you want to drive like an old far then get into the right lane. People like that you that feel self righteous in policing everyone else actually cause more accidents then prevent them. I guess we just need to agree to disagree here because arguing with you is like talking to a brickwall
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
7,844 posts, read 13,229,550 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by boliqua2 View Post
Again there are more dangerous roads then the LIE that has 55 mph speed limits. Deer Park Avenue,RT 347 , RT 454 that have 55 mph speed limits The LIE could easily have the speed limit raised to 65 mph for most of its length. Most drivers in the area feel more comfortable around 65 mph. If you want to drive slower drive in the middle or right lanes that is what it is for. Left lane should be passing only and you should NOT cruise in the left lane at 55 mph.

What they should do is do a study raise the speed limit to 65 mph from Exit 40 to Exit 73 and have a study done to see if fatalities or accidents go up or not if they don't then the speed limit should be kept at 65 mph if not then they should lower it back to 55 mph.

Utah DOT (UDOT) Did just this.
Utah DOT: No Downside to 80 MPH Speed Limit Increase | The Truth About Cars
They found NO INCREASE in accidents or fatalities along this stretch. Just because you like driving at 55 mph and some how it makes you feel magically safer doesn't mean it is actually safer. The 55 mph was enacted in 1974 to save gas during the oil crisis not safety

I feel though that no matter what I or anyone says in this thread you will never change your mind but if you want to drive like an old far then get into the right lane. People like that you that feel self righteous in policing everyone else actually cause more accidents then prevent them. I guess we just need to agree to disagree here because arguing with you is like talking to a brickwall
UTAH?? How is citing a study done in UTAH, where no one feels the need to move fast at all, helpful when referring to NYC or Long Island? People in Utah, like most of the midwest, are not in a rush, that's probably why they didn't take advantage of the 5 mph increase. And I doubt there are as many cars on the roads in Utah as there are here. They probably don't even have as many busy roads as we do. Using Utah is a poor example. In NY, if we increase the speed limit another 5 mph, I bet drivers will then go over another 10 mph. Give an inch and people take a yard. The speed limit is 55, there are drivers already pushing it to 65-70. You can't force someone to drive faster but I do agree if anyone is going to drive the speed limit that they do it in the right lane. Unfortunately there are too many drivers who don't know the rules of the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Baywood NY
134 posts, read 250,689 times
Reputation: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellakin123 View Post
UTAH?? How is citing a study done in UTAH, where no one feels the need to move fast at all, helpful when referring to NYC or Long Island? People in Utah, like most of the midwest, are not in a rush, that's probably why they didn't take advantage of the 5 mph increase. And I doubt there are as many cars on the roads in Utah as there are here. They probably don't even have as many busy roads as we do. Using Utah is a poor example. In NY, if we increase the speed limit another 5 mph, I bet drivers will then go over another 10 mph. Give an inch and people take a yard. The speed limit is 55, there are drivers already pushing it to 65-70. You can't force someone to drive faster but I do agree if anyone is going to drive the speed limit that they do it in the right lane. Unfortunately there are too many drivers who don't know the rules of the road.
How about DC Metro area which is comparable to LI when it comes to traffic. I95 in Virginia just south of the Beltway is 65 mph. It reminds me of the LIE but with a fancier reversible toll HOV lanes. I don't hear about carnage on the road along that stretch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2012, 11:01 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,970,654 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by boliqua2 View Post
How about DC Metro area which is comparable to LI when it comes to traffic. I95 in Virginia just south of the Beltway is 65 mph. It reminds me of the LIE but with a fancier reversible toll HOV lanes. I don't hear about carnage on the road along that stretch.
When was the last time that you were on I95 south of DC? I was just down there a few months ago and the second there is a problem, traffic backs up for hours.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top