Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2009, 09:40 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?

The ten least manly cities:

1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento

The ten most manly cities:

1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed

Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 07:08 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2009, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,761,592 times
Reputation: 17831
You could almost replace "manly" with "unaffordable" for some reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 09:48 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
252 posts, read 960,773 times
Reputation: 198
This study was commissioned by the makers of COMBOS brand bacon, egg, and cheese crackers, the "Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR." Unsurprisingly their criteria skewed towards redneck-oriented cities. I agree that LA should be proud to be on the bottom of the list. The least "manly" cities are among the most vibrant cities in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 09:56 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.

And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:52 PM
 
1,542 posts, read 6,041,064 times
Reputation: 1705
notice how five of the cities on the list are in california? the creators of this "study" must think that the golden state is filled with granola-eating, birkenstock-wearing, flower power hippies and/or "q.ueer eye/project runway" metrosexual types.

in all seriousness, the list seems to insinuate that "cosmopolitan" = "unmanly". perhaps the high concentration of frozen yogurt shops bumped LA up a few notches?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:02 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Notice, also, that they listed San Francisco as the #1 "emasculated" city.

Hmm. Playing into stereotypes for the NASCAR crowd? I'm shocked! Shocked, I say!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:03 PM
 
Location: los angeles
5,032 posts, read 12,610,547 times
Reputation: 1508
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.

And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
yeah, I guess "manly" means stock cars\ chain saws\ beer & pig rind
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:12 PM
 
1,542 posts, read 6,041,064 times
Reputation: 1705
the funniest of the criteria used to determine the "winners" of this study Moderator cut: was the Manly “Kryptonite” Category / Emasculating Criteria

scroll to the bottom of the page, where you'll see the rankings for this category.

so as the owner of a honda who regularly patronizes coffeeshops and sushi restaurants, i guess i'm a prime contributor to an entire metropolitan area's decidedly unmasculine lifestyle?

also, notice how san francisco and oakland are ranked 1 and 2 amongst metro areas for "emasculating criteria". since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?

i guess the creators of this study really hate the bay area and/or the west coast and northeast?

i mean, surely they're not a tad biased?

Last edited by Green Irish Eyes; 03-16-2009 at 11:57 PM.. Reason: Copyright issues -- please post only a sentence or two (or a link) -- thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:19 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbergen View Post
since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?
That's definitely strange. It makes it look like a sloppy study. Oakland and San Francisco actually are considered to be separate "metropolitan divisions" by the Census Bureau, but then so are Los Angeles and Orange County, which they obviously did not separate as two distinct places.

I'll forgive them. I'm sure they were drunk on Schlitz Beer and Cheetos when they did their research.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:23 PM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,974 posts, read 33,958,318 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?

The ten least manly cities:

1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento

The ten most manly cities:

1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed
Notice how the "Manly" cities are much less affordable (i.e., much less desirable) than the "least manly cities". Property values, cost of living and overall desireability seems to be some other of the distinguishing characteristics of the least manly locations.

Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 07:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top