Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2009, 07:23 PM
 
Location: outnabout
97 posts, read 220,257 times
Reputation: 67

Advertisements

I wonder how many are following this 'incident'.
Huey Lewis, others bait ducks to end hunting along Bitterroot's Mitchell Slough

Sure has stirred up a stink...one that will most likely reach from - sea to shining sea.
What's your take?
Overall, looks like sour grapes to me. Montanans (as well as the rest of us) value our rights, both traditional and given to us by law.
That's why I feel the landowners are in the wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2009, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,369,351 times
Reputation: 7979
It's not very nice of them, but I have to side with the property owners on this one. You can't campaign for property rights only when it benefits you, I bet many of the people in the discussion on that article have argued for property rights in other cases, but now when it's limiting them they think they should get to do whatever they want.

Is there so little public land left in MT that not being able to hunt this one slough is this big a deal? I'm not being sarcastic, I really don't know. I know in some states like Texas it's just about impossible to hunt without paying for a hunting lease from one land owner or another.

I'd rather not have huge flocks of ducks or geese pooping all over the place, which is what Lewis and others is going to end up with after feeding them. They may find their "solution" is worse than their perceived problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2009, 10:55 PM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
317 posts, read 1,090,521 times
Reputation: 154
Whether the property rights question is a legimete one or not, individual citizens should not have the right to take away state granted privileges of others. By feeding the birds, they are denying the state granted rights of others to hunt. That's wrong.

If this concept was spread to other things in life (that a private citizen could prevent another private citizen from doing a particular action), it would be very, very bad. I'll let you think about the potential consequences if your neighbors or non-neighbors were allowed to stop you from doing a particular thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 12:59 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
It disturbs me that someone can behave like this AND claim to be a rancher. Ranchers generally understand that wildlife management doesn't mean just making sure they all stay alive no matter what. It also means hunting as may be desirable to keep numbers in check and populations at a healthy level (witness what happens when deer are not hunted).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 01:00 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon View Post
I'd rather not have huge flocks of ducks or geese pooping all over the place, which is what Lewis and others is going to end up with after feeding them. They may find their "solution" is worse than their perceived problem.
Occurs to me that they may be setting up the sort of crowding (especially with gluttonous birds like waterfowl) that leads to epidemic disease and a huge die-off, too. How is that to the birds' benefit??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 01:01 AM
 
Location: NW Montana
6,259 posts, read 14,676,883 times
Reputation: 3460
Great point Rez.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
Another thing... when you have an intensive congregation of waterfowl, they tend to outright destroy their environment. Geese are the worst, but ducks will do it too -- eat everything down to the mud and poop on what's left, and now you've set it up for invasive weeds to take over.

This isn't healthy for anything that has to use that water downstream either, as it'll have more than the natural amount of giardia and coccidia (and nitrogen compounds) from all that bird poop -- kinda like running it through a feedlot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 01:16 AM
 
Location: NW Montana
6,259 posts, read 14,676,883 times
Reputation: 3460
giardia Nasty, had a bout with it once after an extended duck hunt, and I was basically the cook!
Division of Parasitic Diseases - Giardiasis Fact Sheet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,061,367 times
Reputation: 2147483647
I'll bet that he's not on that Ranch more then 30 days total in a year. It's sad that they do that. They are completely undermining the entire Game Management program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2009, 08:02 AM
 
Location: SW Montana
355 posts, read 1,146,766 times
Reputation: 254
Got a friend who has a farm, 3rd generation, grows nothing but grass hay the old way - flood irrigation and old equipment. Usually takes just one cutting a year, sometimes two if the year's just right. His place is overrun with whitetails due so many new neighbors this past 20 years who think of them as pets.

FWP won't help him with damage hunts; he lets as many people on his place every hunting season as possible to try and thin the lot out. Like Reziac said, there is more disease than average, and he has seen more than one population crash. Whities can overpopulate quickly.

I was sorry to see that happen over in the Bitterroot; that sort of situation is what adds fuel to the fire on Montanans' attitudes towards newcomers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top