Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I dont think ANY REMAKE can be as good as the original..... (Or hardily any -- ESPECIALLY NOW!! (After 2000))
Sure they can.
Here's the thing, though.
Now that someone else has already had the great idea and done most of the work for you, there is no excuse for ANY remake to be less than the original.
And yet so many/most are.
We shouldn't measure the remake against the original. We should have MUCH higher standards for it.
I dont think ANY REMAKE can be as good as the original..... (Or hardily any -- ESPECIALLY NOW!! (After 2000))
Sure it can. In fact, I can think of lots of remakes that are BETTER than the original.
DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS
TRUE LIES
THE MALTESE FALCON
THE FLY
THE THING
THE DEPARTED
OCEAN'S ELEVEN
KING KONG
INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS
SOME LIKE IT HOT
TRUE GRIT
I myself prefer SEVEN SAMURAI, but I know people who prefer THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN.
Sure it can. In fact, I can think of lots of remakes that are BETTER than the original.
DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS
TRUE LIES
THE MALTESE FALCON
THE FLY
THE THING
THE DEPARTED
OCEAN'S ELEVEN
KING KONG
INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS
SOME LIKE IT HOT
TRUE GRIT
I myself prefer SEVEN SAMURAI, but I know people who prefer THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN.
It seems that the line between sequel and remake can be fuzzy.
Why do a simple remake? There is always room for improvement?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.