Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Constitutionally you have the right to bear arms to defend your home or say go hunting. It doesn' mean you can have your gun wherever or do whatever with it.
Kefir is 100% right. Anytime the court creates law, it is working outside of its intended and codified purpose and permissions. The Court exists to ensure Congress and the President work within the confines of the Constitution, nothing more.
"...shall not be infringed," doesn't need to be interpreted by SCOTUS and cannot legally be changed by Congress without an amendment being approved. ALL guns laws are unconstitutional, plain and simple, just as much police searches without warrants are.
The Supreme ruled those gun laws constitutional, and therefore they are. The court is working exactly as it was intended to work. It just didn't rule as you wanted it to.
Good questions -- lemme wake up Michael Moore to give you the answers you want to hear.
If you followed the thread -- guns were brought up as an examples when some people pick and choose when to follow the Constitution. For example choosing the Constitution on the S&F, but ignoring it the right to bear arms.
The Supreme ruled those gun laws constitutional, and therefore they are. The court is working exactly as it was intended to work. It just didn't rule as you wanted it to.
I am not against those SCOTUS rulings, but SCOTUS is hardly the Constitutional watchdog you portray it to be.
Yea and in logic that's called 'red herring fallacy'. It's way to deflect from the actual argument.
If You gun nuts wanna discuss the second amendment I suggest you post in one of the 10,000 threads this forum has on this subject.
Yea and in logic that's called 'red herring fallacy'. It's way to deflect from the actual argument.
If You gun nuts wanna discuss the second amendment I suggest you post in one of the 10,000 threads this forum has on this subject.
And if you want to refer to an issue like an adult, you don't use the term "gun nut".
Somebody who proclaims that 'all gun laws are unconstitutional' as another guy said in this thread IS the very definition of a gun nut.
Or would you prefer I call him 'mentally unstable gun advocate'? Please.
Last edited by likeminas; 08-18-2013 at 10:07 AM..
Somebody who proclaims that 'all gun laws are unconstitutional' as another guy said in this thread IS the very definition of a gun nut.
Or would you prefer I call him 'mentally unstable gun advocate'? Please.
Don't put your hand in my face like some sassy, mid-twenties broad...
And if you want to really get down to it, they are all unconstitutional. Technically. That's all he's sayin.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
