Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not saying that it matters. My point is, is that a liberal cannot even admit something that is factually true. I don't think it should be a consideration for people to get married, but can you ADMIT that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
Why would you expect anyone of any political philosophy to admit something that is factually untrue? And what difference could such an admission make, considering that it is completely IRRELEVANT to marriage?
Biologically, no. Homosexuals cannot produce offspring. I know of no liberals that will deny this fact. However, that fact is completely irrelevant, and asinine to even bring up.
So why do liberals throw fits when people describe homosexuality as deviant? It deviates from normal behavior, which is heterosexuality.
Even liberals throw fits if you say homosexuality is abnormal. Heterosexuality is normal, as the vast majority of people are heterosexual. Homosexuals are abnormal because most people are heterosexual. Kind of like how albinos are abnormal because most people have pigmentation. But liberals throw fits when you use specific, and accurate terminology.
Biologically, no. Homosexuals cannot produce offspring. I know of no liberals that will deny this fact. However, that fact is completely irrelevant, and asinine to even bring up.
I'm not saying that it matters. My point is, is that a liberal cannot even admit something that is factually true. I don't think it should be a consideration for people to get married, but can you ADMIT that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
I just did... As well as a lot of other people - kids don't = marriage or vice versa. Your comment has nothing to do with the topic at hand, just a snide remark that got debunked.
Why would you expect anyone of any political philosophy to admit something that is factually untrue? And what difference could such an admission make, considering that it is completely IRRELEVANT to marriage?
So you're trying to claim that two people of the same sex can produce offspring?
So why do liberals throw fits when people describe homosexuality as deviant? It deviates from normal behavior, which is heterosexuality.
Even liberals throw fits if you say homosexuality is abnormal. Heterosexuality is normal, as the vast majority of people are heterosexual. Homosexuals are abnormal because most people are heterosexual. Kind of like how albinos are abnormal because most people have pigmentation. But liberals throw fits when you use specific, and accurate terminology.
Because people mostly use the word "abnormal" to try to justify discriminating against homosexuals.
I'm not saying that you are, and I will say that you are correct in the tense that you are using the word "abnormal".
However, the connotation of the word being negative is because so many have tried to use that word as justification for being bigoted towards homosexuality. As Renault proves.
I wonder if a liberal can even admit that a gay couple cannot procreate. That two people of the same sex cannot produce a child,an dif they use some kind of scientific intervention, the child will still only biologically be related to one of the couple, not both.
There are women that cannot give birth.
There are married couples that don't want kids.
There are gay couples that can adopt.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd
Was there a section addressing perversions and behavior in there because that is all homosexuals are about. They want special laws and priviledges because of their abnormal behaviors.
Do us all a favor and reread the part I've highlighted in blue. Then explain how you see anyone wanting that potion enforced as wanting 'special privileges'. And how it would be based on 'behaviors' whether 'normal' or 'abnormal'.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
