Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Marx's ideas and how they were interpreted/implemented are two different things. Most folks don't seem to realize that and catagorize him with the dyed in the wool communists like Lenin, Stalin or dear Chairman Mao.
Marx actually was a smart guy and had a lot good ideas...in theory. He shouldn't be marginalized and/or automatically discounted (and honestly, he isn't) in educated discussion
Marx's ideas and how they were interpreted/implemented are two different things. Most folks don't seem to realize that and catagorize him with the dyed in the wool communists like Lenin, Stalin or dear Chairman Mao.
Marx actually was a smart guy and had a lot good ideas...in theory. He shouldn't be marginalized and/or automatically discounted (and honestly, he isn't) in educated discussion
I seriously doubt Marx would consider Stalin or Mao a Communist. Workers paradise? More like workers nightmare.
I read Marx's "alienation of labor" recently and I actually agree with a lot of what he says, but my response to the problem he brings up is quite different.
Yes... its a fool's thought... a stateless society where there is no wage? We have HAD stateless society in the primitive times of humanity... you know what? It didn't work out... you can't get something for nothing, that's not how society worked before the invention of money or in make-up land... A society without wages doesn't change the fact that to get me to do something its got to be worth my while.... Marx brushed it aside saying we will do it "just because I said so" doesn't go over well with me but his fans missed it completely... unless there is someone with a gun telling me I have to or threaten me, it ain't going to happen...
Marx's ideas and how they were interpreted/implemented are two different things. Most folks don't seem to realize that and catagorize him with the dyed in the wool communists like Lenin, Stalin or dear Chairman Mao.
Well Marx was no less dyed in the wool that any of them, the only problem (well not the only problem) is that they ignored his arguments that you couldn't have a socialist state until capitalism had reached its highest level of development. Imperial Russia was barely a capitalist state and even more barely an industrial one. As for China... shouldn't have even been mentioned in the same breath.
But I still hold a great deal of his analysis regarding the effects of capitalism on the working class as being right on the money. What to do about is a whole other issue.
In my opinion everyone should read and implicitly understand the US Constitution and what it all means before graduating from high school....
US Constitution doesn't deal with capitalism versus Marxism. So you may stop your attempt at deflection and stick with the topic at hand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.