Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Either we are a group species or a solitary species. Which is it? If we are a group species, we help each other. The lucky share their spoils with the less lucky of their species. That's how we came to dominant the earth and the other species.
Or we can just declare ourselves a solitary species and we can fight each other for everything. Let's try that some more and see how it works for you. Works great for the other 99% of species below us, doesn't it?
Our Constitution doesn't empower the federal government to be an all knowing benefactor. It has no accountability and squanders most of what it takes in through inefficiency and corruption.
The church and countless other charities that do it much better and give taxpayers the freedom of choice.
And they can be held accountable.
Our Constitution doesn't empower the federal government to be an all knowing benefactor. It has no accountability and squanders most of what it takes in through inefficiency and corruption.
The church and countless other charities that do it much better and give taxpayers the freedom of choice.
And they can be held accountable.
Well, whichever method you choose I am in favor of charity being compulsive when people are in poverty or in danger of starving.
Well, whichever method you choose I am in favor of charity being compulsive when people are in poverty or in danger of starving.
It is not charity when it is forced; it is theft. Show me where in the United States people are in danger of starving and there are no social safety nets to help them.
Poverty in the US comes with a cellphone, housing, foodstamps and medical care.
Our Constitution doesn't empower the federal government to be an all knowing benefactor. It has no accountability and squanders most of what it takes in through inefficiency and corruption.
The church and countless other charities that do it much better and give taxpayers the freedom of choice.
And they can be held accountable.
The Constitution doesn't empower anything. It only limits what government can do.
WE empower the government to do whatever it's doing.
It is not charity when it is forced; it is theft. Show me where in the United States people are in danger of starving and there are no social safety nets to help them.
And the social safety net is funded how? That's right...via compulsory taxation! In other words, it's a compulsory charity!
I was dropping by my children elementary school and look at their book posting behind the glass door and notice a book call "heroes and leaders", the usual people is on it, FDR, Lincoln, and Washington. And then I noticed Obama is on there too. I was like, wtf he do?
My points, Obama is a corporate puppets, not a socialist as some claimed. Look at all the things he have done, he did it for corporations. If he is a socialist as some have claimed, the wealth distribution is across the board, which didn't happen. Only the loss is socialized, profit is privatized.
Socialism never spreads wealth across the board. Never.
It takes from the middle calss and gives to the rich. Exactly what Obama is doing.
He is also merging corparations with government. Slowly but surely.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
yawn...
I think Obama's paycheck is not his own, he needs to give it away. Let him eat his own words.
