Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, it's one solution vs no solution. At least no solutions that you have brought to the table. To reject a viable solution for something better that may or may not come along NOW doesn't make sense. It's like refusing treatment for a chronic condition in hopes a cure arises.
I don't think this is a viable solution. If some one has ahead ache and you say cut out their frontal lobe, and I say thats not a good idea, that does not mean you have offered a decent solution.
And I dont find that link to be much of a 'study'.
I don't think this is a viable solution. If some one has ahead ache and you say cut out their frontal lobe, and I say thats not a good idea, that does not mean you have offered a decent solution.
Obviously, I don't think homosexual parents are akin to cutting a brain. That only really speaks to whatever issues you have with gay parents...issues that don't make sense since you haven't provided much of an argument.
Quote:
And I dont find that link to be much of a 'study'.
What would you suggest instead of a longitudinal study? What do you consider to be 'much of study'? lol
Because the lifestyles are not typical of stable households that children are born into.
But, growing up in the system is? How in the world does foster care remotely emulate anything healthy for a child as opposed to a permanent, stable environment?
So what if it is just as stable? If two 16 year olds are empanicapted and have a stable home and want to adopt is that okay? Or polygamists? Or a bachelor?
Too me, it does not matter if the home is just as stable, it is still not really appropriate, imo.
So basically you have no argument other than you don't like the idea of anything other then the nuclear family being raised? Even if it forces children to stay in group homes or being shuffled off from foster family to foster family?
Because the lifestyles are not typical of stable households that children are born into.
And typical is better because?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How in the world does foster care remotely emulate anything healthy for a child as opposed to a permanent, stable environment?
