Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:44 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudvoterofObama View Post
Reposting for [mis]informed.

You can go at this until Christ 3rd coming.

Suffice it to say that there are only two forms of citizenship, natural born or naturalized. Period.

 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:47 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycwind View Post
There is no such thing as a British Subject. Next.
Good grief.

Here's a thought... educate yourself. Read the British Nationality Act of 1948:
British Nationality Act 1948
 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:50 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,752,932 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
This:

Your quote addresses another issue. It addresses jus sanguinis, not jus soli Either one is enough to make you a natural born US citizen. Whether or not he was at the same time regarded a British citizen according to British jus sanguinis law is irrelevant. If his parents had been British diplomats, things might be different.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:52 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
You can go at this until Christ 3rd coming.

Suffice it to say that there are only two forms of citizenship, natural born or naturalized. Period.
Wow. Too bad a SCOTUS decision disproves that.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:58 AM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,014,113 times
Reputation: 10416
The postings on threads like this make me realize that our Special Education system is deeply flawed.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 09:59 AM
 
184 posts, read 142,276 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Good grief.

Here's a thought... educate yourself. Read the British Nationality Act of 1948:
British Nationality Act 1948

The British empire is dead. All laws are therefore null and void. Are all Americans still British subjects in your mind?
 
Old 12-01-2010, 10:00 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Your quote addresses another issue. It addresses jus sanguinis, not jus soli Either one is enough to make you a natural born US citizen. Whether or not he was at the same time regarded a British citizen according to British law is irrelevant.
No. The SCOTUS decision is quite clear; it even refers to those born within the jurisdiction without regarding parents' citizenship status as 'citizens' only, not 'natural born' citizens.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 10:03 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycwind View Post
The British empire is dead. All laws are therefore null and void. Are all Americans still British subjects in your mind?
You know, it really would help if you just read the British Nationality Act of 1948.
British Nationality Act 1948

Ignorance is not an excuse when you have info provided for you.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,550,307 times
Reputation: 24780
Lightbulb Obama 11, Birthers 0

Something tells me the birthers are going to start hating the scorekeeper pretty soon.

h8ers

.
 
Old 12-01-2010, 10:10 AM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,959,438 times
Reputation: 1817
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
This:
The full discussion says that while children of 2 US citizens parents are definitely natural born there is debate over whether all children born in US, regardless of parents status, are also natural born. The judge says "For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." In other words - the court did not rule on the natural born definition.

MINOR v. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 162 (1874)

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.


Note: MINOR v. HAPPERSETT was about a woman's right to vote.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top