Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,761,940 times
Reputation: 24863

Advertisements

Momonkey - So the loss of respectability is the real problem. How is respectability a legal problem?

Why should the sex of the committed adults matter? Why is a religiously acceptable marriage more respectable than a secular marriage? Why, for that matter is being married more respectable than being a couple with arrangements to take care of the children if any?

Most importantly, why should I and my partners care about what you, your church or society in general consider respectable. I just want my arrangements to be as legal as yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2011, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
3,849 posts, read 3,750,837 times
Reputation: 1706
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
It doesn't do away with it.

It changes it.

Who are you to change the definition, meaning and significance of someone else's cultural, religious and legal union?
How would my friends Ric & Jacob getting married change the definition, meaning and significance or YOUR marriage? Please be specific.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
3,451 posts, read 7,052,940 times
Reputation: 3614
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
It doesn't do away with it.

It changes it.

Who are you to change the definition, meaning and significance of someone else's cultural, religious and legal union?
I asked a very specific question to a certain poster who had said that gay marriage weakens the institution of marriage...not whether it changes it.

Who am I...I am an American, and as such am allowed to work for change.

Who are you to day that I cannot do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,929,539 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsMcQ LV View Post
How would my friends Ric & Jacob getting married change the definition, meaning and significance or YOUR marriage? Please be specific.
They cannot answer that simple question, it has been asked many many times and no one has yet stepped up to the plate and explained their own rhetoric. I, for one, know that my marriage would not be affected in the least by allowing loving gay couples enjoy the same union. Not mention the rights and benefits enjoyed by married couples that are not allowed to gay couples or even single heterosexuals for that matter. It all comes down to religious beliefs, something that should not be driving the laws and rights applied to the people of this nation.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
3,451 posts, read 7,052,940 times
Reputation: 3614
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Gays want to rid themselves of the stigma of being homosexual by hijacking marriage.
Unless you are a homosexual please refrain from speaking like you represent us.

I as a homosexual care nothing about the "stigma"...I stopped caring about it over thirty years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
3,451 posts, read 7,052,940 times
Reputation: 3614
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
NO!

You don't get to use fake motives for gays insisting on marriage while turning up their noses at civil unions. Civil unions could be structured to provide the same identical benefits and rights as marriage, but gays have no interest in civil unions because they don't address the real issue. Gays want desperately to rid themselves of the stigma of being gay. Civil unions, no matter the legal structure, will never make gays feel "normal". To do this, they will make the rest of us a little less normal by forcing us to associate ourselves with gay sex through the institution of marriage.
You just don't understand...you act as if you know what we want...but you don't know.

If gay marriage is going to make you feel less normal than you have much deeper problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
3,849 posts, read 3,750,837 times
Reputation: 1706
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlerain View Post
You just don't understand...you act as if you know what we want...but you don't know.

If gay marriage is going to make you feel less normal than you have much deeper problems.
Proven by the simple fact that none of them is able to answer a question as to just how their marriage would "change" were gay couples able to marry legally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,731,520 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I see, you can't differentiate between a human adult and a pet.

Yes I can. But that wasn't the question, was it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,165,636 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlerain View Post
If gay marriage is going to make you feel less normal than you have much deeper problems.
This. Times 1000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,731,520 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
<SIGH> Will people ever stop using this ridiculous strawman?

People might be allowed to marry their pets after pets obtain the ability to legally enter into a contract. Can Fido sign a lease or get a loan? No? There's your answer.

That scenario is absurd in the extreme and has no bearing on TWO ADULTS consenting to enter a legally binding "marriage".

Yes, it does have bearing. We have had a "one man and one woman" definition of marriage for a long time. Now some people want to change the definition to "any two humans".

So, while we are changing the definition, why not liberalize it completely. Why not open up to plural marriage. Why not open up to marriage between a human and their pet.

And who are you to make a rule that the pet has to be able to legally enter into a contract?????? Pets don't legally enter into a contract to be "owned" by a human either. But that does not mean they cannot be owned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top