Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-13-2011, 08:53 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
My Republican friend said he thinks 70% of the 53 billion $$ if approve would go towards the NE were Rail is well used and causes massive redevelopments..... Even during the Bush era , the NE was pampered by Republicans and alot of redevelopment occurred. A population shift is underway in the Megapolis form auto suburbs to Railway suburbs.....which is also feeding the Railway usage spike. Towns and cities are building up there downtowns and making them dense and walkable.... There competing with each other....hehe. There are 18,000+ miles of Railway that should be restored either by private or public funding for Passenger Rail.... Connecting all the Northeastern cities and large towns..... Those of you against this , are mostly outside the NE and are either rural folks , jealous or uneducated on the subject of diverse transportation....
or we are just tired of having money forcibly taken from us to pay for someone elses special interests (i.e "diverse transportation" )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2011, 08:54 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,320,466 times
Reputation: 1911
Most of you red staters are just welfare queens as most red states don't actually pay a net penny in taxes. Whine to me about having money forcably taken from you when your state actually net pays taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 08:58 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
Most of you red staters are just welfare queens as most red states don't actually pay a net penny in taxes. Whine to me about having money forcably taken from you when your state actually net pays taxes.
Cute rant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 09:12 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,859,429 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
or we are just tired of having money forcibly taken from us to pay for someone elses special interests (i.e "diverse transportation" )
Well the same can be said about highways which spur little to no growth vs. The Massive growth with Rail....look at New York's Satilite cities...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,213,258 times
Reputation: 16752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
or we are just tired of having money forcibly taken from us to pay for someone elses special interests (i.e "diverse transportation" )
Okay - so the problem is not railroads, but public funding.

So CHANGE the system.

Instead of public (taxpayer) funded rail, with all its political baggage, just STOP taking tax money from rail.

Demand that government institutes a ZERO tax liability for any electric traction railroad company and its employees that ONLY builds, manufactures, installs, operates or maintains said railroads. That way, the only way it prospers is by serving the customer - not a bureaucracy, nor insiders, nor power grabbing politicians.

That solves the financing problem, gives incentives for rapid progress, and steers the industry to seek moving the most people for the least cost. It won't cost the taxpayer one non-silver dime.

Can you guess how big a job boom there will be?

Oh, right, government was instituted to serve government's needs, increase its power, increase revenues, and burden the people - my mistake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 10:42 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,320,466 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Cute rant
Rant? That's the hard reality. Red state, except for a very few exceptions, are welfare queens which don't pay net taxes. Whine about taxes after your state actually pays net taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 10:46 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,320,466 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Okay - so the problem is not railroads, but public funding.

So CHANGE the system.

Instead of public (taxpayer) funded rail, with all its political baggage, just STOP taking tax money from rail.

Demand that government institutes a ZERO tax liability for any electric traction railroad company and its employees that ONLY builds, manufactures, installs, operates or maintains said railroads. That way, the only way it prospers is by serving the customer - not a bureaucracy, nor insiders, nor power grabbing politicians.

That solves the financing problem, gives incentives for rapid progress, and steers the industry to seek moving the most people for the least cost. It won't cost the taxpayer one non-silver dime.

Can you guess how big a job boom there will be?

Oh, right, government was instituted to serve government's needs, increase its power, increase revenues, and burden the people - my mistake.
That's not a new idea and while I like the notion the reality is that has never worked any where in the developed world. The reason is simple: without use of eminent domain it becomes almost impossible to build the lines because one stubborn old git could stop everything no matter how much social good would come from the improvement of infrastructure. Private industry can't use eminent domain while government can because government's primary purpose is to serve the public good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 11:05 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Okay - so the problem is not railroads, but public funding.

So CHANGE the system.

Instead of public (taxpayer) funded rail, with all its political baggage, just STOP taking tax money from rail.

Demand that government institutes a ZERO tax liability for any electric traction railroad company and its employees that ONLY builds, manufactures, installs, operates or maintains said railroads. That way, the only way it prospers is by serving the customer - not a bureaucracy, nor insiders, nor power grabbing politicians.

That solves the financing problem, gives incentives for rapid progress, and steers the industry to seek moving the most people for the least cost. It won't cost the taxpayer one non-silver dime.

Can you guess how big a job boom there will be?

Oh, right, government was instituted to serve government's needs, increase its power, increase revenues, and burden the people - my mistake.
So rail won't pay taxes, but motorists, airlines and bus companies will?
Unless we all get the break, you're just using a different way to subsidize and create a privileged industry (for an insignificant amount of ridership to boot).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 11:11 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
That's not a new idea and while I like the notion the reality is that has never worked any where in the developed world. The reason is simple: without use of eminent domain it becomes almost impossible to build the lines because one stubborn old git could stop everything no matter how much social good would come from the improvement of infrastructure. Private industry can't use eminent domain while government can because government's primary purpose is to serve the public good.
Boy you're a hoot.
You want the federal government to confiscate my money and my land to run a choo choo train for a privledged few.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 11:22 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,927,270 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Boy you're a hoot.
You want the federal government to confiscate my money and my land to run a choo choo train for a privledged few.
Why not? They already do it for roads and airports.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top