Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:20 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,982,506 times
Reputation: 4555

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Where does the US Constitution grant Congress the authority to create a high-speed rail system, or fund a train of any kind for that matter?

The last time I checked, the US Constitution granted Congress the power to "establish Post Offices and Post Roads." Please tell me they are not going to pretend that a rail system has something to do with delivering the mail.

Is it any surprise that Congress does not give a damn about their restrictions and limitations under the US Constitution, when we do not care either?
It says nothing about public education either but there it is.

You should get a lawyer and tell your theory about the unconstitutionality of using funds for railroads to the Judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g4m View Post
There isn't a public rail or bus transit system anywhere that pays for itself. All of them are subsidized by tax payers or vehicle owners. So how will taking more money out of the pockets of tax payers and vehicle owners improve our economy?

It wont.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
It says nothing about public education either but there it is.

.
Yes, you are correct, and that's another area that should be taken away from government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:23 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,859,429 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Gees, all that rail and only on the east coast. No wonder easterners want to be like Europe. They already have the rail system just like Europe. Meanwhile, all the western states have to pay so easterners can be just like Europe. What a bunch of pathetic parasites.
LOL , well every state has a Rail plan.... Feds Fund plans that will get the highest usage , thus the Eastern states or Northeastern. Republicans are more willing to fund are Rail plans also....so we can survive a Republican take over pretty well. Just with slightly less.... Alot of Europeans live here , so its like a mini Europe.... The states are paying for most of those miles , but some of the larger and busier lines will be built by the Feds , our Economy is also driven by Rail...so we need it more then you.... You can always come over here and use it , you don't have to be an Eastern...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:23 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,982,506 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Yes, you are correct, and that's another area that should be taken away from government.
Hey just because you didn't benefit from it, don't project that on others.

Last edited by padcrasher; 02-08-2011 at 08:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,458,697 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
It says nothing about public education either but there it is.
I see, so you are using one unconstitutional act to justify another. That sounds like what a three year old would say: "Why did you break that glass Johnny?", his mother asks. "Because Tommy broke that dish", Johnny replies. Can you get any more pathetic than that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,832,599 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacific Swell View Post
Building high-speed trains will obviously create jobs. But they have potential to do even more. Say a high speed train gets built in rural Iowa. These folks would be able to commute to Chicago or St. Louis to work for a fraction of the time it would take to drive.

During previous recessions, people would pack up and move to cities with job growth. Now, due to the dismal housing market, people are less likely to move away.

These high-speed trains can change the way we think about commuting. They can let people in rural areas compete for jobs in the city.

U.S. unveils $53 billion in high-speed rail plan - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110208/pl_nm/us_usa_transport_rail - broken link)
Screw that... put extra lanes on the interstates. It in an infrastructure that is already in place. Then duplicate the speed limits as per the German autobahn...i.e. none
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:31 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,982,506 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
I see, so you are using one unconstitutional act to justify another. That sounds like what a three year old would say: "Why did you break that glass Johnny?", his mother asks. "Because Tommy broke that dish", Johnny replies. Can you get any more pathetic than that?
Tell it to the Judge,....bub.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Hey just because you didn't benefit from it don't project that on others.

You have no knowledge of my education experience, but that doesn't stop you from these silly posts, does it.

If you think the government is doing a good job with education, your standards are quite low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 08:36 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,927,270 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Screw that... put extra lanes on the interstates. It in an infrastructure that is already in place. Then duplicate the speed limits as per the German autobahn...i.e. none
So, how much do you think it would cost to put extra lanes on I95 between Boston and Washington? Don't forget to factor in new bridges or rebuilding existing ones like the GWB in New York.

Also, there are speed limits in many places on the Autobahns especially in built up areas. I95 is built up from New Haven to Philadelphia, from Providence to Boston, etc. etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top