Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2011, 06:35 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
uh, yeah...I think Charlie Sheen has a City-Data.com/forum account...
LMAO...ok, if you say so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2011, 06:38 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post

This was edited to "Every body" for TV. 'Cuz that ain't what it said in the movie.

Die Hard with a Vengeance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You and i both know that TV does that all the time. You can't show the same things on network TV that you show in the theatres. Come on Ford....i know damn well that you're smarter than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 06:44 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
In 1974 people (the market) were far less sensitive to what WHITE ACTORS said regarding highly combustible racial terms. Today in 2011, it could prove financially detrimental to have WHITE ACTORS say the things on film that were said in 1974. A producer may want to make the film but the people who pay for it would perhaps feel that the risk of offending certain groups would not be worth it.
Not a shred of evidence exists to back up that paragraph. None whatsoever.

And we're not talking about "the people" here. The reason that you feel it wouldn't get made today is because you obviously think that someone would be offended...and that someone is black people. C'mon...you think i don't understand THAT? What "certain groups" are you referring to? You think that your statement is so nebulous that i can't see that?

Again, prove to me that blacks would be up in arms about it when they weren't back when the original was made?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Here
2,301 posts, read 2,033,947 times
Reputation: 1712
To tell you the truth, I wouldn't say conclusively that the movie could be made in this day-and-age. It barely got made 35 years ago.

Aside from that, I respect people's opinion that the film is tasteless, and perhaps even offensive. Not everyone "gets" satire. And almost no one gets all satire. That may be particularly true with Blazing Saddles' outright silly satire. I often write satirical posts and I'm always ready for people to "not get it". Humor by its nature has the potential to be offensive, at least to some people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 07:43 PM
 
Location: FL
1,138 posts, read 3,347,725 times
Reputation: 792
Talking Yep!

Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
No. The film would be considered a "hate crime" today...even though it was co-written by a black (Richard Pryor).
So toally agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,663,996 times
Reputation: 11084
Sure it could be made today. It's light years beyond movies like "Superbad" or "The 40-Year Old Virgin".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 08:31 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,231,338 times
Reputation: 2857
Tropic Thunder had Robert Downey Jr playing a role in blackface. That's a huge potential firestorm. It did create controversy, bloggers and critics discussed the appropriateness (or inappropriateness) of a white actor doing such a thing, given the racist history of whites mocking blacks with blackface and minstrel shows. But controversy aside, the film was made and screened, and in 2008.

I haven't seen Blazing Saddles more than twice, and a long time ago, but I thought it was demeaning to racists, not demeaning to black people. Yes, it uses demeaning language - used by idiots. Bart is a confident capable man, and is clearly the superior to the white men who are so stupid to be fooled when Bart takes himself "hostage" by pointing his own gun at his head!

I think it could be made today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2011, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,286,152 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
A) You've got me confused with another poster because this very sentence is the first time I've mentioned NAACP and ALCU.

B) Why are you speaking for this person? Is this another one of those "two screennames, one account" situations?

C) Are you Charlie Sheen?
On A that can be true.
I was simply gobsmacked at the comment made to DD and assumed that that the other idiot post was of the same ilk.

B, I was speaking for myself and not for anyone else.
I didn't understand and your comments were absurd and directed at DD.
See, in a community, one can support another. That's what community does.
In fact, that's what a society does... supports others.

C, apparently not.
I used logic and followed your incoherent comment to a post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:11 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,663,996 times
Reputation: 11084
People can defend themselves perfectly well, they don't need anyone's help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:44 AM
 
1,081 posts, read 916,241 times
Reputation: 551
Make a movie like that and the lawsuits would fly. The NAACP would throw a huge party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top