Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course life isn't fair, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't do our best to be "more fair." Obviously equal outcomes aren't always possible, but "in order to form\ a more perfect union" we need to ensure that all people have the opportunity to have a reasonable outcome in their lives. It's natural for have-nots to be jealous of the "haves," but it's not class-warfare when the rest of us look to those with wealth to pay their fair share, or even a little more. People get rich for a number of reasons: sometimes it's hard work and other times it's luck.
Alphamale: Every time a leftist is in front of a camera, the first point they make about about "fairness".
Are we for equality of opportunity or outcome?
Your comment: "Obviously equal outcomes aren't always possible, but "in order to form\ a more perfect union" we need to ensure that all people have the opportunity to have a reasonable outcome in their lives".
The "workers" forced the steel industry to leave America.
Without employers, you have no employees.
Will you please think things through before posting?
I'm getting tired of correcting you.
A business runs with workers. Without workers, there are no products.
Simply put no products means no business.
My nephew understood that when he was 3.
Is that such a hard concept. Hell, you even alluded that you need to pay talent well to have successful business. Now you're saying that workers are not needed for a successful business? Which is it?
What excuse? That a fringe element MAY or MAY NOT have been violent? Is that the excuse that I stated that violence was not a huge factor (it wasn't). Sorry if history and facts are now an excuse?
Alphamale: Every time a leftist is in front of a camera, the first point they make about about "fairness".
Are we for equality of opportunity or outcome?
Your comment: "Obviously equal outcomes aren't always possible, but "in order to form\ a more perfect union" we need to ensure that all people have the opportunity to have a reasonable outcome in their lives".
Good line.
The only outcomes some care about are their own.
I only care about myself.
But, in caring about myself I have put a lot of money in the system...creating jobs.
Of course, the mods would be run ragged deleting posts
I should not have stooped to that. It was immature. I will edit the comments. Hopefully, and sincerely, I hope that alphamale will also delete the same comments he made (verbatim).
That's how scabs should be dealt with. You don't betray people in your own class. And a person who does is the lowest of the low and deserves to get a reminder of his proper place.
People in unions are in a class all on their own, you can't get much lower so it would be hard to find a scab that is betraying their own class. Only a union fool would try to tell remind someone of the "proper place" they feel someone should be in.
But, in caring about myself I have put a lot of money in the system...creating jobs.
And others have put money in the system, creating wealth for you too!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
