Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It really just shows that anyone who can't be trust i marriage conrct are likely not to be trusted in politcs without hiding the facts. If not we would have sen clinto with no resoan to lie;Kennedy not need shileding by the media then i his camelot fraud;and others in both parties come clean. We see now it even now year later now it comes back to ginrich. Whetehr democrat or republican it is used aginst the perosn by the oppostite party and people factor it in on the question of trust.lok at Teddy keddy's loss to Carter an unknown pretty much in the democxrtic race. It hurts a candidate the rest of his years.Were is Gary Hart a rising star for instanes and there are more.
No matter how advanced or sophisticated the world pretends to be, people are still people, and men are still men.
The male animal did not evolve (or was not designed - depending on your religious bent), to be monogamous. It is so against his character as to be abhorred by the very FIBER of his being.
When is the world going to stop pretending to be shocked when men do what men do? How many prominent men have been in this same situation? Dozens? Hundreds?
It's NORMAL. It may not be accepted. It may not be fashionable. But it's NORMAL. What Maria (and Princess Diana) did not understand is that the proper response is to graciously look the other way.
20yrsinBranson
Do you say the same thing when women get involved in extramarital affairs? Should the cheated on husbands just "graciously look the other way?"
It's ok... I totally understand that you have a hard time with big words. Go ahead and fire up that other brain cell and you'll realize that "Newtie" isn't part of the topic nor are Republican presidential candidates since neither have anything to with Schwartzenegger's infidelity. I have faith in you that you'll figure that out sooner or later. After that, might wanna work on your reading comprehension.Good luck, sport!
That's "Newtsie" and he, since he's still alive and CURRENTLY running for president(or thinks he will be)...he's more relevant...
"Tit for Tat" is fun...but sheesh try to find someone, like Edwards if you need to show that Democrats do it, too....
WoW! CleVER! However, anytime/everytime any Repug politician is caught with his pants down the Repugs trot out Ted kennedy's accident of 50 years ago. John Kennedy has been dead for 50 years...THAT is what I was referring to....
Very mature.
Like my post stated, his list consists of many names that do belong in the 21st century. Why don't you acknowledge this?
No matter how advanced or sophisticated the world pretends to be, people are still people, and men are still men.
The male animal did not evolve (or was not designed - depending on your religious bent), to be monogamous. It is so against his character as to be abhorred by the very FIBER of his being.
When is the world going to stop pretending to be shocked when men do what men do? How many prominent men have been in this same situation? Dozens? Hundreds?
It's NORMAL. It may not be accepted. It may not be fashionable. But it's NORMAL. What Maria (and Princess Diana) did not understand is that the proper response is to graciously look the other way.
20yrsinBranson
Good Lord, do you actually believe your own BS?
"Graciously look the other way"??????
How positively Victorian.:sm ack:
Arnold "The Groperator" Schwarzenegger was just pushing the Republican "family values"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.