Supreme Court ruled today: States can enforce Federal laws (crimes, myth, companies)

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

Because the US Chambers of Commerce sued the state of Arizona?

When one entity sues another, it usually ends up in court?

What exactly are you arguing?

You said the door's were open? I asked why it went to court...if the door were open?

[BentBow]

Brewer talking about seizing all business and personal assets!!!!!

The brass balls that chic has, just dropped.

[BentBow]

Go Jan!!

My kinda gal!

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

Not trying to provoke anything?

Right.

I know what I posted. Obviously you don't, because your rebuttals are not en pointe.

I misread your original posting, I stand corrected, but your mommy should really have also taught you not to violate TOS in your responses.. Enjoy

[Frank DeForrest]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Brewer talking about seizing all business and personal assets!!!!!

The brass balls that chic has, just dropped.

Way out of line.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest

Way out of line.

I think it is awesome!!

Deterrents do work. You must use illegal help, or there would not be a problem.

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

You said the door's were open? I asked why it went to court...if the door were open?

The ruling by the court clearly demonstrates that the door was open.

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by pghquest

I misread your original posting, I stand corrected, but your mommy should really have also taught you not to violate TOS in your responses.. Enjoy

I didn't violate TOS in my response. The joy of being elliptical.

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Thats not a list either.. Whats the matter, cant backup your own claims?

Since you're unaware, filibuster is a process for the minority to use and stop the majority from a "takeover". And republicans (and democrats alike) have done so plenty of times. Let me at least give you a few counts:
106th Congress (1999-2000): 58 times (most with democrats as a minority)
110th Congress (2007-2008): 112 times
111th Congress (2009-2010, 2 months): 40 times

Considering the obligation I now have to provide you with at least one example of filibuster, to help you stop running in a circles:
Republicans Filibuster 9/11 First Responders Bill

Just an example of how just being the majority doesn't guarantee success.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Since you're unaware, filibuster is a process for the minority to use and stop the majority from a "takeover". And republicans (and democrats alike) have done so plenty of times. Let me at least give you a few counts:
106th Congress (1999-2000): 58 times (most with democrats as a minority)
110th Congress (2007-2008): 112 times
111th Congress (2009-2010, 2 months): 40 times

Considering the obligation I now have to provide you with at least one example of filibuster, to help you stop running in a circles:
Republicans Filibuster 9/11 First Responders Bill

Just an example of how just being the majority doesn't guarantee success.

I know darn well what a fiibuster is, but that doesnt backup your claims. What one of these would have fixed illegal immigration issues?

I also note the dates, not one of them coordinate with the timeline in question, where Democrats held all 3 branches of government..

Try again.