Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. They said federal law prohibited states from imposing their own immigration-related rules on employers.
Yes. But I didn't challenge that. I said that the state couldn't impose ID requirements that violated people's civil rights. For instance, a state cannot charge thousands of dollars for such ID, because poorer people would be effectively disenfranchised. So, perhaps before you go around smacking your head, you should read what I wrote.
Thats not at all what you wrote, and you are still wrong. The Supreme Court ruled in 2000, (Bush vs Gore), that there is no right to vote in america
The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1.
Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. They said federal law prohibited states from imposing their own immigration-related rules on employers.
Other than demonstrating that you finally read the opinion... what are you attempting to argue with this post since this is precisely what those of us who had previously read the decision have been saying since the beginning of the thread.
Arizona can enforce the e-verify program, which is a great start to getting rid of illegals, pushing them into liberal states that welcome them with open arms.
Georgia's new immigration bill might influence what state farmers can grow | Marketplace From American Public Media (http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/05/17/am-georgias-new-immigration-bill-might-influence-what-state-farmers-can-grow/?refid=0 - broken link)
Georgia's new immigration bill might influence what state farmers can grow | Marketplace From American Public Media (http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/05/17/am-georgias-new-immigration-bill-might-influence-what-state-farmers-can-grow/?refid=0 - broken link)
Perhaps instead of reading headlines and then proclaim some non-existent relationship between the states and the Federal government you should take time to read the facts before the Court and the Court's decision in that case.
Thats not at all what you wrote, and you are still wrong. The Supreme Court ruled in 2000, (Bush vs Gore), that there is no right to vote in america
The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1.
Spin away all you want. What is wrote is there for all to see. You are wrong, and trying to provoke me. It won't work.
State can make and enforce laws, they pass that mirror federal law
The doors were never closed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
