Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's a terrible thing to say but seeing as how these guys won't be charged with a hate crime like woud happen if the situation were reversed I can't say I'd be disapointed seeing that happen.
I don't understand your statement. Blacks are more likely to be prosecuted with hate-crime enhancements than whites.
The US is about 12% black, but roughly 20% of people prosecuted with hate crime enhancements are black.
The US is about 73% white, but roughly 62% of people prosecuted with hate crime enhancements are white.
I don't understand your statement. Blacks are more likely to be prosecuted with hate-crime enhancements than whites.
The US is about 12% black, but roughly 20% of people prosecuted with hate crime enhancements are black.
The US is about 73% white, but roughly 62% of people prosecuted with hate crime enhancements are white.
When was the last "white" spokesman that you heard going before the public and denouncing any actions of white people doing bad things simply because the people were white???..
When did the last "white" spokesman exist? You don't see any white people come out and defend white criminals on the basis of race.
Funny that you left out the percentage of each charged with any crimes so we could draw up a ratio of crimes to hate crimes. Population won't cut it.
It's not funny. I was responding to a post that claimed only white people are charged with hate crimes and that black people aren't. That's just not true. 20% of all hate crime prosecutions are against black people despite the fact they only make up 12% of the population.
Your the first one to do it, now you can call yourself a racist and give yourself a pat on the back and feel good for being liberal who loves diversity for doing it. Congrats
Proof a GED dosen't always prove one can read!!!
So please post for everyone to see where I am protecting, justifying, or giving these guys protection, an excuse, or any rationale for what they did??
Get back to us when you can manufacture something...
It's not funny. I was responding to a post that claimed only white people are charged with hate crimes and that black people aren't. That's just not true. 20% of all hate crime prosecutions are against black people despite the fact they only make up 12% of the population.
And you left out the number of crimes they commit. Do you not see the hole in your logic?
The poster was responding to an assertion that NO black people are charged with a hate crime.
The poster proved that to be patently untrue and posted the information.
Now you what to pipe in with how many "crimes they commit"...
What has that got to do with the fact that they are charged with the crime someone says they never get charged with???
Because if they get charged with more crimes those charges can still have a lower percentage of hate crime charges among them. It's very simple.
Population is useless. The only valid statistic you could present was that X percent of black people charged with crimes are charged with hate crimes, and X percent of white people charged with crimes are charged with hate crimes. I'm not even saying you're necessarily wrong, but your original numbers don't present a valid conclusion.
No Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson? or any of those ''respected black leaders''? (What a joke!).
Why am i not surprised .
Why do White people always want to know what Jesse and Al have to say about something?
Where are the "respected" White leaders?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.