Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:16 PM
 
2,031 posts, read 2,989,449 times
Reputation: 1379

Advertisements

"...who would never be elected today"


‪Rep. Duncan Hunter: Must elect even moderates to stop Obama and his communists‬‏ - YouTube


Quote:
HUNTER: This is it folks. This is it. There is nothing after 2012. [...] I don’t care if it’s a more moderate/former liberal like Ronald Reagan, who would never be elected today in my opinion. If it’s someone like him or a hardcore conservative, you gotta elect the most winnable person this time. I know it sounds bad, but Congress makes the law. You’ve got a conservative Congress. You’re one third there. [...] You gotta vote and get behind an electable person for president. I know after what I said, me saying that doesn’t go hand in hand. Obama’s going to raise a billion dollars. He’s going to hold on to this thing, the communists in this country, the community organizers in this country, are going to hang on for dear life. This is it for them. If they can change the balance of the scale of this country, they will affect it until our downfall.
Weird. Not only does Hunter call Reagan a "moderate/former liberal" (my guess is he's trying to liken Reagan to Romney), but he says Reagan "would never be elected today" but that he'd be much better than Obama -- who, of course, could get elected today, obviously. So if a "moderate/former liberal" like Reagan is the Republican nominee, Hunter says it's important for people to vote for him (even though he says such a person could never get elected) because it's important to "get behind and electable person".

I'm impressed at the amount of confused, wrong, and self-contradictory stuff Hunter is able to pack into one paragraph!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
Typical RWA thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,171,323 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyageur View Post
"...who would never be elected today"


‪Rep. Duncan Hunter: Must elect even moderates to stop Obama and his communists‬‏ - YouTube


Weird. Not only does Hunter call Reagan a "moderate/former liberal" (my guess is he's trying to liken Reagan to Romney), but he says Reagan "would never be elected today" but that he'd be much better than Obama -- who, of course, could get elected today, obviously. So if a "moderate/former liberal" like Reagan is the Republican nominee, Hunter says it's important for people to vote for him (even though he says such a person could never get elected) because it's important to "get behind and electable person".

I'm impressed at the amount of confused, wrong, and self-contradictory stuff Hunter is able to pack into one paragraph!
Reagan was a former liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:25 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,944,845 times
Reputation: 12828
I think Reagan could still be elected today but he would be considered a moderate (RINO) with some aspects of his policies, especially immigration (amnesty part I) and his raising of the debt ceiling without cutting spending first.

Our country is in significantly greater debt, involved in many overseas wars, and another generation has grown, had children, run up personal credit card debt, bought too much house, and been tied to the government teat of dependency, since Reagan left office.

Generally I like Hunter but I think he is wrong about trying to place yet another "moderate' in office. Those moderate Republicans (RINOS) have damaged our country nearly as much as the Progressive liberals.

Ron Paul 2012!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,292,039 times
Reputation: 1333
I think Reagan could get elected, because contrary to Conservative belief, he isn't the ultra-Conservative politician that he is made out to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,367,910 times
Reputation: 2922
Just a note : this is Duncan Hunter's son.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:29 PM
 
3,504 posts, read 3,925,040 times
Reputation: 1357
reagan would be tarred and feathered by todays right.

remember this guy reagan gave amnesty to illegals, and he is hollywood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:35 PM
 
22 posts, read 42,338 times
Reputation: 32
and Reagan ran our national debt sky high!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2011, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Hollywood, CA
396 posts, read 906,497 times
Reputation: 331
Reagan was to the left on Obama on quite a number of issues.

Cenk Uygur: Who is More Conservative: Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama?

Here is a list from that article

Ronald Reagan:

-Gave Amnesty to Illegal Immigrants
-Negotiated with Terrorists (Traded Arms for Hostages with Iran)
-Raised Taxes on a Large Scale Four Times (After Initially Lowering Them)
-Negotiated with the "Evil Empire" without Pre-conditions
-Made a Decision to "Cut and Run" From Lebanon After Our Troops Were Attacked


Barack Obama:

-Escalated the Afghanistan War (Added 30,000 More Troops)
-Has Ordered Drone Strikes (Assassinations) on US Citizens Outside the Country
-Gave Drug Companies Near Monopoly Power by Barring Imports, Extending Patents and Not Allowing the Government to Negotiate Better Prices
-Funneled Billions into the Biggest Banks in the Country After They Crashed the Economy
-Stacked Deficit Commission with Fiscal Conservatives
-Lowered Taxes Significantly (Stimulus Bill)
-Ordered Increased Offshore Drilling Before BP Spill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top