Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2011, 04:32 PM
 
1,568 posts, read 1,552,674 times
Reputation: 414

Advertisements

I don't care how big his house is. He should not care how big anyone else's house is.

Comprendo?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2011, 04:34 PM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,371,679 times
Reputation: 3059
I bet 99 of those 99%ers could live there in comfort.

Hey MM, get started spreading that wealth around you hypocrite!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Portlandia "burbs"
10,229 posts, read 16,307,727 times
Reputation: 26005
His house doesn't surprise me at all. Can't say that I necessarily think he's wrong to have it. But I do think it's an ugly-ass house. Not my style.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 05:41 PM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,486,186 times
Reputation: 1431
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyDay View Post
He's wealthy. He made his money through hard work starting back in hard scrabble Flint, MI. He came from the 99, and has its interests at heart. This is haterism. If you had his money you'd move out of your moms house too.
No one is decrying his accumulation of wealth. What is being decried is his stinking hypocrisy which is all too typical of wealthy liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 07:00 PM
 
2,674 posts, read 4,395,590 times
Reputation: 1576
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
No one is decrying his accumulation of wealth. What is being decried is his stinking hypocrisy which is all too typical of wealthy liberals.
Rich people. Buy big houses. No hypocrisy. This movement has gone rabid and is against anyone that's made an honest buck and knows the value of hard work.

-John Galt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 11:28 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,328,605 times
Reputation: 7624
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigchuckie View Post
Probably has 6 bedrooms and one big kitchen
Or 1 bedroom and 6 kitchens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 11:37 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,864,528 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Or 1 bedroom and 6 kitchens.
Damn I was just about to say that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 05:30 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,756,723 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by believe007 View Post
The size of Michael Moore's house is irrelevant; who cares? At least the man is trying to shed some light on what's wrong with this country; maybe you just don't want to know.....or you're part of the problem

No he's not. He's just trying to make money. Which I have no problem with. I don't care how much money other people make.

Now his hypocrisy is another matter altogether. That's disgusting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 06:08 AM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,794,508 times
Reputation: 2366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Kim View Post
Nice place. I guess you can pile up as much money as you want, then declare yourself the 99%, and that's that. No questions asked.
Michael Moore has never denied he is rich. But neither does he resist paying his share of taxes. He encourages it and is quite generous with his money for many causes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 06:13 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,062,846 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Not at all. Under socialism, there are still the haves and have nots. He's just making sure he secures his place among the former, because you can't get to be a "have" through money under socialism, but rather through your connections to government.
Socialism is for the people, not the socialists.

I bet he wouldn't let the ows people anywhere near this place!

I wonder how generous he is to his staff? Are they unionized? Do they get full benefits....pension, healthcare?

I highly doubt it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top