Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:47 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Dude gave you the "not seasonally adjusted" numbers...
Of course. They have been instructed to do this by their puppet masters. The WH/DNC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I didn't use anything, you guys did. Can you say Flip Flopping Hypocrites? If not, I can say it for you.
Just as soon as you can stop complaining about jobs being created, and differentiating it from jobs NOT created.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:53 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,477,016 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Of course. They have been instructed to do this by their puppet masters. The WH/DNC.
Labor force dropped, employment went up and UE (and rate) went down.

How they came to the conclusion otherwise is astonishingly acrobatic like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post

Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Dude gave you the "not seasonally adjusted" numbers...
In Walker's defense, seasonally adjusted, the number of employed has shrunk by only 9200.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Oh, now jobs are jobs? What were you lefties hollering about when it was posted that Texas lead the nation in job creation? Wasn't it something like, "those jobs are worthless, they are minimum wage jobs!"? Wasn't it something like that? You guys are hilarious!
To be fair here, we will give Walker credit for even minimum wage jobs-even though these jobs are not of much benefit.

However, Walker's job numbers fail even if we include any minimum (slave) wage jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:56 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
In Walker's defense, seasonally adjusted, the number of employed has shrunk by only 9200.
They still have a lower UE rate than Ill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
They still have a lower UE rate than Ill.
There is more to reality than the UE tells you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:58 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Just as soon as you can stop complaining about jobs being created, and differentiating it from jobs NOT created.
Huh? What is this babble? Dude, you make ZERO sense! Is that on purpose just to muddy the waters because you don't want to get caught with your pants down? It seems so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:58 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,534,561 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
.

John Nichols: Under Walker, Wisconsin is No. 1 job loser


No wonder is spending millions on ads to fend off the growing popularity of his being recalled. He's toast.
Good you should pay for it when you elect someone like him
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 08:59 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
There is more to reality than the UE tells you.
LOL. Please explain professor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top