Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'd bet my next paycheck that the most vociferous supporters of abortion are those who have had one. Human psychology dictates that a person seek absolution of his/her actions, and ridiculing those who see human life as a worthy endeavor is one of the ways the pro-abortioners compensate for their own personal irresponsibility.
Considering almost half of all abortion seekers have had more than one abortion, I don't think we can ever expect the pro-abortioners to put forth a pro-life argument because it simply does not jive with their own actions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimbochick
I think this statement is quite offensive. For what it's worth I have never had an unplanned pregnancy, nor have I had an abortion. That is quite irrelevant to the discussion and my stance.
Ditto, Zim. This guy can't get pregnant and never could.
Why does government need to intrude into the patient-doctor relationship? If a doctor or the patient decides that viewing an ultrasound image is necessary, then let them make that decision themselves.
Last time I checked, government had no right to make me watch anything. Government can mandate that material is made available, but that's where it ends.
Laws such as this are purely un-American. Shame on Texas.
Why does government need to intrude into the patient-doctor relationship? If a doctor or the patient decides that viewing an ultrasound image is necessary, then let them make that decision themselves.
Last time I checked, government had no right to make me watch anything. Government can mandate that material is made available, but that's where it ends.
Laws such as this are purely un-American. Shame on Texas.
I don't particularly like this law, but other states are enacting similar laws.
I was a bit confused also. So when you use the argument its a womans choice and her body you are correct, but when i use the argument I'm wrong? You seem offended i was using this argument
With the entire country concerned about the high cost of health care, has anybody addressed who is going to PAY for the implementation of this law? It has to be considered; this is not going to be cheap, and it certainly isn't going to be paid for by women who don't want or need it (and often can't afford it).
Why not just let the woman and her doctor decide what is needed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet
How does the law stop a woman and a doctor from making the choice?
What I was referring to is the decision about whether a sonogram is needed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
