Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She's 31 years old, in a highly Democratic area, where they even have a black Democratic mayor. Why do you guys think she'd be a Republican or even a tea partier?
Thats right.. because YOU hate..
I live in Texas, where politicians tend to win for having an "R" next to their name. Given the state of the republican party and republicanism, I would hate to be called a republican.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979
Private land owners should be able to discriminate against who they'd like. If an black business owner doesn't want to serve white folks, he should be able to limit who enters his store.
That said, I find what this land lord did to be terrible, and I hope that those in Ohio and the surrounding community ban together to abandon this building and not rent there at all until the sign is taken down or is bought by a new owner.
We should keep anti discimination laws for public land and facilities, but privately owned should mean that you can do what you want on your land.
I agree with you on all points of your post...If it is MY ground I will retain the right to say who comes on it,BUT I also would expect a backlash from hell if I were to do something such as he did...I support his rights even if he is a first class idiot.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country
Really? so if I walk out naked on my personal land that should be ok? What about animal sex on personal land?
Nothing against you as I think we should all be able to "do our own thang"...but please don't move in next to me....my animals have enough trouble as is.........
The reason (hair chemicals) is a moot point. It's his property so he is free to discriminate against whoever he wants for whatever reason he wants. I don't agree with him, but it's still his right to do so.
I don't believe people on here who say I don't agree but they should have the right. I'm sorry but if you want me and my kids to see our race made to seem as second class citizens by any person on any publicly visible property you do agree. If my child seen that sign telling them that its about property rights aint gonna cut it. Its about setting what society will and will not tolerate. Before you know it if I accidentally turn around on someone's property and they shoot me for it because they have a no blacks sign up some will say that is acceptable. If you say its OK you agree with it period. None of this ron paul I wouldn't go there but they can do it BS. Thats a cowards way out.
i dont buy the concept that people will stop going. if starbucks said no blacks, white people would still go there and get coffee.
Exactly not to mention the mental drain that puts on blacks but then again the reason why ron paul and many on here want this to be allowed is so that can be one more thing to weigh blacks down.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
