Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-18-2012, 10:19 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,283,089 times
Reputation: 3296

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
You can sure tell who does get their (mis) information from Rush, Glenn, Sean, Ann or Sarah, huh?

Almost all of it is word-for-word parroting. LOL
I do agree that medicine is medicine..

You could use condoms and avoid meds unless you have a latex allergy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2012, 10:43 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29449
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
I do agree that medicine is medicine..

You could use condoms and avoid meds unless you have a latex allergy.
Condoms don't do a whole lot for polycystic ovarian syndrome, do they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 11:15 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,283,089 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Condoms don't do a whole lot for polycystic ovarian syndrome, do they?
That is where meds are needed and birth control pills are for sure meds.

Is that a fibrotic condition in part?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
That is where meds are needed and birth control pills are for sure meds.

Is that a fibrotic condition in part?
Polycystic ovary syndrome - MayoClinic.com
You can learn about PCOS from reading the above link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
Pelosi didn't create this nonsense...........
Of course you don't know that the meeting that started this whole thing was brought about by Nasty Nancy. You could have known a lot more about the whole thing if you had tried to keep up in the beginning. If Nancy didn't make all the arrangements for a meeting room, media coverage of the not at all official meeting, and all else then one of the other three Democrats on the "panel" formed it all up. I guess you didn't see the C-SPAN video I had on the board of the meeting and the woman's "testimony" of single cases she knew about one or two women. Maybe you should see that one and how the others always called her Leader in every reference they made.

Yep, without Nasty Nancy the whole thing never would have happened. If the woman hadn't given her "testimony" to that non-committee how would Rush have known what she really is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Your link says that the claim is not all true or all false. Therefore you interpret it as not really true although the claim by Snopes says that at least part of it is true. When I see them talking mixture I always think that there is some truth in the claim, but I am not looking for that false alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 10:50 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,334,196 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Your link says that the claim is not all true or all false. Therefore you interpret it as not really true although the claim by Snopes says that at least part of it is true. When I see them talking mixture I always think that there is some truth in the claim, but I am not looking for that false alone.
Yeah, part of it IS true - problem is, it's NOT the part "unconcious" is claiming to be politically significant (ie that Pelosi was behind it in order to maintain her profits - there's NO evidence of that at all).

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 10:57 AM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,256,164 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post

Yep, without Nasty Nancy the whole thing never would have happened. If the woman hadn't given her "testimony" to that non-committee how would Rush have known what she really is?
WOW!

This has got to be some of the strangest, weirdest, twists of logic I think I've ever seen - even coming from you.

So, you are totally exonerating that fat SOB - RUSH - because, according to your twisted logic, it is all Nancy Pelosi's fault, that RUSH would never have gone on a three day disgusting ATTACK on someone none of us had ever heard from, if Nancy Pelosi had not arranged for Miss Fluke to speak?

WOW!

So, no personal responsibility needed on RUSH's part, 'eh? He's an innocent victim in all this? You cons are always screaming about "personal responsibility" when it comes to other people and issues, why no "personal responsibility" for RUSH?

You are apparently very selective about who you apply "personal responsibility" to. Can you say, "H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?"

I do believe I have heard just about everything, and I realize I shouldn't expect any better from you - I just find your reasoning very, very strange.

Last edited by Cinebar; 03-19-2012 at 11:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 11:11 AM
 
Location: The Nanny State of MD
1,438 posts, read 1,146,353 times
Reputation: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
WOW!

This has got to be some of the strangest, weirdest, twists of logic I think I've ever seen - even coming from you.

So, you are totally exonerating that fat SOB - RUSH - because, according to your twisted logic, it is all Nancy Pelosi's fault, that RUSH would never have gone on a three day disgusting ATTACK on someone none of us had ever heard from, if Nancy Pelosi had not arranged for Miss Fluke to speak?

WOW!

So, no personal responsibility needed on RUSH's part, 'eh? He's an innocent victim in all this? You cons are always screaming about "personal responsibility" when it comes to other people and issues, why no "personal responsibility" for RUSH?

You are apparently very selective about who you apply "personal responsibility" to. Can you say, "H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?"

I do believe I have heard just about everything, and I realize I shouldn't expect any better from you - I just find your reasoning very, very strange.
Its pretty sad that you cant "say" something without getting personal with someone.

Fluke is a joke. Shes just looking for publicity, and its working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 11:21 AM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,256,164 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by personwhoisaperson View Post
Its pretty sad that you cant "say" something without getting personal with someone.

Fluke is a joke. Shes just looking for publicity, and its working.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

So, when I call Rush a "fat SOB," you criticize ME for "getting personal?"

But then you turn around, in the next sentence, and call Miss Fluke "a joke?"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Do you even KNOW what the definition of "hypocrite" is?

Too funny. LMFAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top