Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2012, 11:27 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,826,886 times
Reputation: 9728

Advertisements

The one-child policy would be no problem if the Chinese were not so sexist for cultural reasons. If every couple simply accepted their first and only child regardless of its sex and used contraception thereafter, things would be fine. At least for a while, sooner or later a tsunami of old people would become a huge burden...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2012, 11:29 AM
 
4,184 posts, read 4,204,986 times
Reputation: 2092
One child policy is wrong. The argument on "not enough" food to feed the population is a fallacy.

The reason why there was not enough food in the 60s and 70s because of the socialist system. It did not give the people an incentive to produce. All productions were belong to the government and then you were issued vouchers to exchange meat, rice and clothing. It was a depressing environment.

My mom used to tell me how great China was when Mao was ruling. You can leave door open and no one would take your stuff. My response to my mom: NO SH1T. No one own anything. What is there to steal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 02:16 PM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,359,020 times
Reputation: 3360
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
One child policy is wrong. The argument on "not enough" food to feed the population is a fallacy.

The reason why there was not enough food in the 60s and 70s because of the socialist system. It did not give the people an incentive to produce. All productions were belong to the government and then you were issued vouchers to exchange meat, rice and clothing. It was a depressing environment.

My mom used to tell me how great China was when Mao was ruling. You can leave door open and no one would take your stuff. My response to my mom: NO SH1T. No one own anything. What is there to steal?
Socialism is not the cause of children starving. Neither is capitalism the antidote to child malnutrition.

Eastern Europe was socialist, nut never experienced hunger outside of war or government caused famines. India is capitalist, and has more malnourished children than china ever did. Most African countries are capitalist, yet over 10 percent of the children born there will die of starvation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 02:20 PM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,359,020 times
Reputation: 3360
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruxan View Post
^^^^^ for how long?? every place has a limit, including the earth...
I don't think we have even come close to that limit. The united stares is one of the least populated countries of the world. I think in terms overpopulation, only east Asia and south asia are pushing their limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 02:32 PM
 
Location: West Egg
2,160 posts, read 1,962,163 times
Reputation: 1297


There seems to be no correlation whatsoever between the words that emanate from Michelle Bachmann and reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 02:58 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,200,802 times
Reputation: 5941
Is this the same Bachmann who said she was going to be the President?LOLOLOL!!!!! Yes it is!

OOOps! Wrong yet AGAIN!!!


This the same Bachmann who wanted a McCarthy style investigation of members of Congress for anti-American( meaning not in agreement with her) statements.

Now, please have Ms. Submissive-to-her-husband show us some FACTS that PROVE that the garbage coming out of that overglossed mouth is true...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 09:05 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,295,022 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
Open up the case of the computer you are typing on and look at the parts.

Then be careful while dismounting from high horse, don't want to sprain anything.
Why would I do that? I'm not going to.

At the same time, you are correct.

It's hard to escape anything made in China.

But I do the best I can. Especially when it comes to cheap crap "household" decorations and infant/baby/toddler toys.

Especially after I had a ton of the toys for my little one re-called due to China's neglect of even thinking that lead based paint was a "new" issue they should be concerned about.

How STUPID can one country be?

What did that little "issue" cost those fools - who knowingly did what they did?

Why are you ok with it? Are you Chinese?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,616,159 times
Reputation: 9030
Of all of the public goofballs in the USA this Bachmann has struck me as the absolutely goofiest of the bunch. Why would anything such a headcase says be news at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 10:26 PM
 
4,042 posts, read 3,538,721 times
Reputation: 1974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
ANYONE who believes this, ANYONE who even suggests this, is a moron.

Unfortunately I already saw one person here post it as gospel. I didn't know Bachmann was behind it but obviously...

REALLY?! Bachmann is savvy for suggesting this. Maybe she paid closer attention to Obama's CZARS than you did. One of our subvservise-in-Chief's CZARS suggested that our population can maybe be sterilized by something being added to our drinking water that won't hurt the cattle. I'll go look up the name, but am guessing it was his Science CZAR.

Yeppers, it was John Holdren. He co-authored a book titled "Ecoscience" in '77 with Paul and Anne Ehrlich. Here's some quotes from that book. John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet

His book also suggests putting a capsule under the skin of women because he admits the legal and technical problems with drinking water to sterilize a population.


Here, even a pic of the book and amazon will probably let us read inside it per their preview policy...

http://www.amazon.com/Ecoscience-Pop...3258016&sr=1-1

Last edited by Sunnysee; 03-31-2012 at 11:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,799,598 times
Reputation: 5691
This is the sort of tripe the far right loonies are trotting out every week about Obama, which is complete fear mongering. Just when I think it is a joke or she is insulting everyone's intelligence, the flock will start parroting it like the gospel truth. I mean how low can one's standards get?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top