Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't need one, as I'm relying on what valid science says in the links I provided and what the melting ice records in both the arctic and Greenland indicate...If you think you are more informed on the ramifications of a warming arctic than valid science is, then that is pretty arrogant don't you think?
Wikipedia is a valid scientific source? That is all I needed to hear from you Mr. Science. LOL. I could go edit wiki right now if I wanted to. Give me a break.
Wikipedia is a valid scientific source? That is all I needed to hear from you Mr. Science. LOL. I could go edit wiki right now if I wanted to. Give me a break.
It is quite valid enough to educate you on what paleoclimatology is....I suppose that you ignore the other links I posted, either that or you just don't want to read anything that is contrary to your opinions...
Whatever you say Mr. Science. It's not valid at all. You go cite wiki to some scientists and see what they say. You have lost all credibility defending wiki as a valid scientific source.
Whatever you say Mr. Science. It's not valid at all. You go cite wiki to some scientists and see what they say. You have lost all credibility defending wiki as a valid scientific source.
I'm sure I can endure any loss of credibility in your opinion...You will not even address anything I posted, other than you think Wikipedia is not a valid source....Have you ever checked the references posted at the bottom of every Wiki page? That is where the validation is.
What do you have to say about the other links I posted regarding the ice melting in the Arctic and Greenland? Do you deny that this is happening?
What do you have to say about record ice in the antarctic? Do you deny that is happening?
I don't know why it is so difficult for you folks to understand why Greenland was named Greenland. It's not because they found it covered in ice if you need a hint. And there were no SUV's or coal powered plans around back then either. Now see what wiki says about that to make sure I'm right.
You can't possibly be so dense as to believe US output is the only output because that would mean you'd be ignoring how global CO2 output is actually at or near record levels. They have these things called other countries, maybe you've heard of them?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
