Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:37 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Speaking of getting a clue....Obama never said a word during the debate about the Marines training with bayonets or otherwise.
Jeez, wth is with people?
What he said was:

Quote:
You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.
Final Presidential Debate Transcript, Read Text, October 22, 2012 : News : Mstarz

Quote:
Nov. 3, 1909 - Lieut. George Sweet was taken up as a passenger in the first Army Wright aircraft by Lieut. Frank P. Lahm, USA, at College Park, Md. Lieut. Sweet is credited with being the first Navy officer to have flown in an airplane.

Jul. 11, 1919 - The Naval Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1920 provided for the conversion of the collier Jupiter into a ship specifically designed to launch and recover airplanes at sea � an aircraft carrier � later to be named Langley. The engineering plans for this conversion were modified in November and included catapults to be fitted on both the forward and after ends of the "flying-off" deck.
The U.S. Navy

So you can get daps for pointing out that Obama was wrong on this one, once again.

 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,007,099 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
What he said was:

Final Presidential Debate Transcript, Read Text, October 22, 2012 : News : Mstarz

The U.S. Navy

So you can get daps for pointing out that Obama was wrong on this one, once again.
That has nothing to do with my post that you quoted.
Dont try to put words in my mouth, better men than you have tried and failed.
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:41 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,567,226 times
Reputation: 5018
For those who don't understand "Sarcasm" The President was basically telling Romney that due to our vast technological advances since 1917 the Navy doesn't need the same amount of ships! We didn't have nuclear subs or Aircraft carriers back then like we do now!
Does Romney think having the same amount of ships as we did in 1917 makes us "powerful" again? Why doesn't he worry more about such important things that really matter to our National Security instead like "Mali"!!!!!!!
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Speaking of clueless.....if you had bothered to read the thread, you would have known that the POTUS never said anything about Marine k-bars, or any kind of Marine bayonet.
He said that the military uses fewer bayonets, that was a lie.
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,007,099 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
He said that the military uses fewer bayonets, that was a lie.
Read the below post and TRY to understand the big words.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
For those who don't understand "Sarcasm" The President was basically telling Romney that due to our vast technological advances since 1917 the Navy doesn't need the same amount of ships! We didn't have nuclear subs or Aircraft carriers back then like we do now!
Does Romney think having the same amount of ships as we did in 1917 makes us "powerful" again? Why doesn't he worry more about such important things that really matter to our National Security instead like "Mali"!!!!!!!
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:53 PM
 
46,294 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Speaking of clueless.....if you had bothered to read the thread, you would have known that the POTUS never said anything about Marine k-bars, or any kind of Marine bayonet.
Yep you are clueless, did you look at what this poster was quoting? I guess not....
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:55 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,183,567 times
Reputation: 32581
The story of those men is told in the book "Horse Soldiers - The Extraordinary Story of a Band Of U.S. Soldiers Who Rode to Victory in Afghanistan" by Doug Stanton.

Terrific, terrific book about a tremendously brave group of American Green Berets.

(And they were more concerned with BFK's than bayonets. To anyone who understands the reference.)
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:55 PM
 
46,294 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
what a surprise.
Yep...unable to back up your claim...that is NOT a surprise.
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Wow, this is still going on? The Cons must really be desperate if this is what they are latching onto from that last debate....Obama was cracking a joke about Romney comparing our Military to 1917....anyone with part of a brain knows that our Military today is much more advanced than 1917.

But hey, you guys keep up your fake rage, it is funny and sad all at the same time.
 
Old 10-23-2012, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Yep...unable to back up your claim...that is NOT a surprise.
I said I was not surprised you did not read the link. You didn't get it?

I remember you also could not understand the articles which were provided to you showing Mitt Romney was pro gun-bans, and actually banned certain kinds of guns in MA, because he said they were "made for killing".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top