Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I quoted private sector employment over last five months. You didn't understand that? Let me repeat: 755K private sector jobs in the five months you mentioned off the community's nuts service.
If that makes for only 27% of the total jobs added, then it is logical to assume a total of 2.8 million jobs have been added in just five months (your claim being 73% being government jobs). This is my source.
I see that you didn't look at my source. Of course, you will say it is what the source is although surely they wouldn't report false numbers from Secretary Solis, would they. Their numbers about the past 5 months were over 800,000 new jobs but with 621,000 of them being government jobs. Maybe if we both read each others sources we could agree. You first.
mothers staying home with newborns rather than returning to work...
As a social studies teacher, shouldn't you be aware of such routine social trends? Didn't you cover this in your curriculum?
I taught history and government, never any of that garbage called social studies. Also, I did mine prior to 1986 before the progs took over so completely.
Well mr. roy, I look at it this way. You provided a link, and in the first para., it says
and I provided conflicting data, that states the government hiring declined 50,000 jobs in October and was flat in November, and this is the highly respected WSJ link I provided. So, here we have you giving a link to false information or data, and I really didn't attack you, unless you think that attacking your so called cns news is actually news, I view it as propaganda, since it is false. I would much rather believe the WSJ than cns news, but that's ok, people have their preferences to the pablum they're fed by the MSM. You just keep on believing it.
Then you prefer WSJ to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Right? I will have to wonder about that one for a while. However, your attack on my source tells me a lot about where you look for news.
Please list the policies Obama has implemented that directly resulted in the creation of 146,000 jobs last month, which is really not a good number anyway.
Wow! I expected only around 60K to be added because of the Sandy effect.
60K SUCKS!
Reagan created 1.1 million jobs in a single month!
"You should have learned by now on your own that you can’t believe a word the man says. If it is not outright false, it is cast out of context to deliberately mislead. Obama’s statement is like a pediatrician who brags to you that under his care your 16 year old son has grown to 4 feet, 5 inches. At the same point during the Reagan recovery, the economy had created more than 9.5 million new jobs.Moreover, in just one month during the Reagan economic recovery boom,September, 1983, the economy created 1.1 million new jobs. That’s a real recovery."
I found these numbers in several blog spots and thought sharing them with both groups here might be good. It is shocking to me to find that the number of blacks and Hispanics who left the work force last month were so high. What do these people do when they are no longer looking for jobs ? Where do they get their money to live on?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
